100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary LPC Shareholders (Business Law and Practice Module) $4.55   Add to cart

Summary

Summary LPC Shareholders (Business Law and Practice Module)

4 reviews
 194 views  5 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

A complete summary of all chapter handouts, lecture recordings and SGSs consolidated into clear and concise notes with worked examples. Contains everything you need to know for the shareholders sections of the BPP BLP exam including: Shareholders Agreements, Remedies for Minority Shareholders and R...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 11  pages

  • June 9, 2019
  • 11
  • 2018/2019
  • Summary

4  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: joeljoseph • 3 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: maxelmes123 • 4 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: mansi14c • 4 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: zuaibkassam • 5 year ago

avatar-seller
SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENTS

Purpose of SHA

 Initial venture: 2 or more decide to set up limited liability company – set out how they will decide
matters irrespective of shareholdings.
 Joint venture: Entrepreneur / business with experience and another party who sees opportunity and
provides capital. E.g. Ocado – ex-investment bankers and JLP or Sony Ericsson – 50/50 gadget and
telecommunications. SHA details what they are contributing and precise terms.
 Venture capital investment: Institutional investor / high net worth individual invests in company =
SHA sets out what will get in return for investment and how to exit if do not get this return.
 Private equity buyout: Private equity house acquires a struggling business (using limited liability
company as the purchasing vehicle), retains senior managers who become SHs with the private equity
house – SHA regulates relationship.

Relationship to Articles

 Use a SHA as extension to A’s – can contain provisions A’s not allowed to contain.
 SHA acts as contract between some or all of the SHs – agree between themselves how to act
(personal).
 A’s act as contract between company and SHs (S.33 CA 2006) – not personal rights and obligations.
 A’s have to follow the CA 2006 (cannot fetter company’s statutory powers), e.g. can only require an
OR to remove a D – unanimous would be void (S.168).
 But SHA can go beyond – no D can be removed without unanimous consent of SH, can make a private
agreement.
 But if breach SHA and remove D by simple majority then company must accept that vote, other SHs
would just have remedy for breach of contract, consequently tend to stick to SHA – minimises the
effect of majority rule.
 If SHs agree to restrict Company’s statutory powers then company cannot be a party to it, but can be
a party to positive obligations, e.g. to repay loans made by SHs (must be a party to be contractually
bound) – add clause in recitals to say Company is a party to specified severable clauses.
 Russell v Northern Bank Development: SHA included clause preventing an increase in share capital
without consent of all parties to SHA, defendants claimed this unlawfully fettered the company’s
statutory power to alter A’s by SR. held it was enforceable as a private agreement and that the part of
the agreement including the company (thereby unlawfully fettering its powers) could be severed.
 SHs can only enforce rights against the company that are relevant to their capacity as SHs (right to
vote or receive a declared dividend) and can only enforce rights against other SHs through the
company – need a SHA to enforce directly against SH.
 SHA can be kept private – put any commercially sensitive terms there, not in public A’s.
 Need SR to amend the A’s (S.21) so minority (under 25% cannot prevent changes), but usually require
changes to SHA to be unanimous – veto right for minority SH.



Typical Provisions

General Terms:

 Be careful to differentiate between capacity as SH and D’s – cannot fetter Ds (effectively the
company).
 Terms duplicated in the A’s and SHA must be consistent and state that in the event of a conflict SHA
prevails.

Veto Rights

 List certain matters as requiring consent of all / certain number of SHs:
 Change in A’s
 Change in registered office / auditors / company name / accounting reference date
 Borrowing over a certain threshold

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lpc-bpp. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.55. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75323 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.55  5x  sold
  • (4)
  Add to cart