100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Worked out Answers for Section B of Past PYC4807 Exams!! $17.07   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Worked out Answers for Section B of Past PYC4807 Exams!!

9 reviews
 755 views  13 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

I have worked out thorough answers for ALL Section B questions from past PYC4807 examination papers. These notes will help you to prepare for your exam! These notes include ALL Section B questions and worked out answers of previous exams (2017/2018/2019). Please note these notes do not include Sect...

[Show more]
Last document update: 5 year ago

Preview 2 out of 14  pages

  • August 13, 2019
  • October 23, 2019
  • 14
  • 2019/2020
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Unknown

9  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: geraldinerughoonundun • 4 year ago

I thought it will will give answers and explanations of hy we sy this. Not referring me to the texts textbook

review-writer-avatar

By: vhutalindivhuwo • 4 year ago

These answers are clearly worked out and they make studying easier

reply-writer-avatar

By: liesla • 4 year ago

Thank you so much! I appreciate your lovely review of my notes! :)

review-writer-avatar

By: susan63 • 4 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: pezamsengana • 4 year ago

reply-writer-avatar

By: liesla • 4 year ago

Thanks for the review :) Please let me know how I could improve the notes.

review-writer-avatar

By: Ingridscheepers • 5 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: tammybull • 5 year ago

These are amazing. Found them really helpful in addition to my own notes

reply-writer-avatar

By: liesla • 5 year ago

Thank you so much :)

review-writer-avatar

By: kgradebe • 5 year ago

reply-writer-avatar

By: liesla • 5 year ago

Thank you for your awesome review :)

Show more reviews  
avatar-seller
PYC4807 Past Examination (2017/2018/2019) Section B Worked Out Answers




ANSWERS:

Question 1:
Criterion-prediction validity:
- Also known as criterion-related validity.
- Involves the calculation of a correlation coefficient between predictor(s) and a criterion.
- Is determined by means of a quantitative (statistical) procedure.
- There are 2 types of criterion-prediction procedures used to determine criterion-related
validity: concurrent and predictive validity.
- The distinction between these 2 types of criterion-prediction validity is based on the
purpose for which the measure is used.

- Concurrent validity:
- Involves the accuracy with which a measure can identify/diagnose the current behaviour or
status regarding specific skills or characteristics of an individual.
- This definition clearly implies the correlation of two (or more) concurrent sets of behaviours
or constructs.
- Example: Personality questionnaire to diagnose the presence of depression.

- Predictive validity:
- Involves the accuracy with which a measure can predict the future behaviour/ category
status of an individual.
- The fact that psychological measures can be used for decision making is implicit in the
concept of predictive validity.
- Example: Aptitude test to predict future performance in an engineering course.

Any psychological measure can be a possible predictor. A criterion, as the name suggests, is a
benchmark variable against which scores on a psychological measure are compared or
evaluated. Apart from the correlation coefficient, the predictive validity of a measure used to


1

, PYC4807 Past Examination (2017/2018/2019) Section B Worked Out Answers


select or classify people is also determined by its ability to predict their performance on the
criterion, for example job performance.

The concept of criterion contamination must be noted. This is the effect of any factor or
variable on a criterion such that the criterion is no longer a valid measure. For example, a
rating scale is often used to operationalize the criterion variable. Among the shortcomings of
ratings are rating biases where the rater may err on being too lenient or may make
judgments on a ‘general impression’ of a person or on a very prominent aspect only. These
response errors or biases also have a negative effect on the criterion validity. In this instance
we would say that the criterion is contaminated. The criterion must be free from any form of
bias as this will influence the correlation coefficient with a predictor.

Question 2:
(a)

1. Characteristics of suitable test:
- Must be age appropriate.
- Must be able to assess the child’s developmental status.
- Must be standardised in SA.
- Must show significant construct validity – significant construct validity implies that there’s a
shared meaning of the construct across different cultures.

1.1 Suggested measure:
- The JSAIS can be administered to children between 3 – 7 years and 11 months.
- Measures general cognitive intelligence (Spearman’s g factor).
- Has significant construct validity.
- Is standardised in SA.
- Used to evaluate school readiness and predict scholastic achievement.

1.2 Differences between tests for infants and young children:
- Based on the theories of mental development, infant scales and pre-school tests measure
different components of intellectual ability.
- These abilities are associated with the expected level of development.
- Infant tests cover mainly sensory and motor competencies, while tests for pre-schoolers
focus on verbal and conceptual abilities.
- Infant tests include areas such as gross-motor, fine-motor, language development, adaptive
behaviour, personal-social behaviours and sensory-motor intelligence.
- Pre-school tests are more complex, focusing more on cognitive skills.
- When using developmental measures, you need to keep in mind that there is not
necessarily continuity in development from infancy to early childhood.

1.3 Suitability of test items:
- In the scenario, the child is 5 years old and is thus a pre-schooler.
- Items that will be suitable therefore include: items that measure verbal and conceptual
abilities and cognitive skills.




2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller liesla. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $17.07. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$17.07  13x  sold
  • (9)
  Add to cart