100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary AQA A-level Psychology Issues and Debates Revision Notes $9.50   Add to cart

Summary

Summary AQA A-level Psychology Issues and Debates Revision Notes

 21 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

This document is detailed revision notes with all you could ever need to know on the whole AQA A-level Psychology Issues and Debates topic, including AO1 and AO3 content. The notes are subdivided into the subtopics used by the textbook. They include the content from the textbook, which has been com...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 22  pages

  • No
  • Issues and debates
  • June 28, 2024
  • 22
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Issues and Debates
Gender and culture in psychology: Gender bias
Universality and bias

Psychologists are influenced by their social and historical context – may have biased
beliefs, lean towards a subjective view that may not reflect objective reality.

Bias in research may be inevitable despite claims of objectivity and value-free facts.

Bias undermines claims of universality – that conclusions apply to everyone.

May lead to misrepresentation.

Hare-Mustin and Marecek: 2 types of gender bias…



Alpha bias

Exaggerates differences

Often seen as fixed and inevitable, real and enduring

Heighten or devalue females, encourages stereotypes – real and enduring differences
may be beneficial

Caused by trying to avoid universality

e.g. Freud’s psychosexual development:

1. During phallic stage boys and girls develop desire for opposite-sex parent
2. Boy = castration anxiety then identifies with father, girls ‘penis envy’
3. But girl’s eventual identification with same-sex parent is weaker
4. So her Superego is weaker (because it develops by taking on the same-sex
parent’s moral perspective)
5. So girls/women are morally inferior

Said anxiety was a ‘female’ symptom, called it ‘hysteria’.

Saw femininity as a failed form of masculinity.

Can sometimes favour women e.g. Chodorow: daughters and mothers have a greater
connectedness than sons and mothers due to biological similarities – due to child’s
closeness, women develop better abilities to bond with others and emphasise.

Evolutionary theory of relationships – male promiscuity is normal and acceptable –
unlimited supply of male sex cells, promiscuity in women is abnormal and
unacceptable.



Beta bias

Ignores/underestimates differences

,We assume research findings apply to both sexes even when females have been
excluded from research

Often androcentric e.g. Asch’s conformity studies

Cause by trying to assume universality

e.g. fight or flight research – biological research uses male animals to avoid hormonal
changes due to ovulation.

Early research assumed males and females responded to threatening situations with
fight or flight.

Can prompt more research e.g. Taylor

Taylor et al.: not true – tend and befriend – love hormone oxytocin more plentiful in
females, women respond to stress by increasing its production --> tend and befriend,
looking after others.

Misrepresentation of females and males e.g. attachment – emotional role provided
solely by mothers, research on fathers show they can do this too



Androcentrism

Alpha and beta are consequences of androcentrism

Male-dominated e.g. APA’s list of 100 most influential psychologists of the 20 th century
included 6 women – produced by males, for males, about males.

Female behaviour has been ignored, misunderstood and pathologised, subjected to
category of premenstrual syndrome e.g. medicalising female emotions e.g. anger by
explaining these in hormonal terms.

Male anger, on the other hand, is often seen as a rational response to external
pressures (Brescoll and Uhlmann).



Evaluation
 Biological vs social explanations
o Gender differences often presented as fixed and enduring when they are
not
o Maccoby and Jacklin: several studies, concluded girls have superior verbal
ability and boys better spatial
o Suggested these differences are ‘hardwired’ into the brain before birth
o Widely reported, seen as facts
o Joel et al.: used brain scanning, found no such differences in brain
structure or processing
o M&J may have been publicised as it fitted existing stereotypes of girls as
‘speakers’ and boys as ‘doers’
o Should be wary – findings may be explained by social stereotypes not
biological facts

, COUNTERPOINT

o Doesn’t mean we should avoid studying possible gender differences in the
brain
o Ingalhalikar et al: idea that females are better at multitasking as they
have better connected hemispheres may have biological truth to it
o Harasty: females have larger Broca’s areas
o Women’s brains may have better connections between hemispheres
o So may be biological differences but should be careful in exaggerating
their effect on behaviour
o More research needed
 Increasing value of women
o Discussion about gender bias in research --> nowadays look to reduce it
and increase value of women in society
o Cornwell: females better at learning as more attentive and organised –
positive attributes of women
o Males and females do possess differences
o Can develop theories emphasising important of women
o Overcome sexist attitudes and gender bias in research publications
 Sexism in research
o Gender bias promotes sexism in research
o Women underrepresented in university departments esp. in science
o Psychology’s undergraduate intake is mainly female but psychology
lecturers more likely to be male (Murphy et al.)
o More likely that research is conducted by males – may disadvantage
female ppts e.g. placed in inequitable relationships with predominantly
male researchers, female concerns not reflected in research qs
o E.g. male researcher may expect females to be irrational and unable to
complete complex tasks – negatively label, expectations may mean
female ppts underperform in research studies
o Institutional structures and psychological methods may produce gender-
biased findings
 Gender-biased research
o Research challenging gender biases may not be published
o Formanowicz et al.: analysed over 1000 articles relating to gender bias,
published over 8 years
o Research on gender bias funded less often and is published by less
prestigious journals
o So fewer scholars were aware of it or applied it in their work
o Researchers argued that this still held true when gender bias was
compared to other kinds of bias e.g. ethnic + when other factors were
controlled e.g. author’s gender and methodology used
o Gender bias not taken as seriously as other kinds of bias
 Real-life implications
o Creates misleading assumptions about female behaviour
o Fails to challenge stereotypes
o Validates discriminatory practices

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller eilisboden. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73243 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.50
  • (0)
  Add to cart