100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
MRL3701 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 August 2024 $2.93   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

MRL3701 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 August 2024

6 reviews
 697 views  35 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

MRL3701 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 August 2024 ; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.6.7-1.7.1-1.7.3.9. Ensure your success with us ......... See the table below and match the columns to answer the following questions....

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • July 11, 2024
  • 6
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

6  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: smmosikare368 • 1 month ago

review-writer-avatar

By: tseno9 • 2 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: tebohomx2 • 2 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: koketsomakapana • 2 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: mathonsipb • 3 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: teclancobgo • 3 months ago

avatar-seller
MRL3701
Assignment 1 Semester 2 2024
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations

Unique number:

Due Date: 30 August 2024


QUESTION 1

(a)

1. Case name: Amod v Khan 1947 (2) SA 432 (N)

2. Ratio decidendi of the case: The relief sought in a sequestration application is directed
at diminishing the legal status and capacity of a particular individual debtor, so it should
pertain to that debtor’s circumstances only.

3. Area of Insolvency Law applicable: Compulsory Sequestration.




Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
• Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
• Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
• Fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.


Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without
any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as a result of
reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for comparison, research
and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any
form or by any means.

, +27 67 171 1739

QUESTION 1

(a)

1. Case name: Amod v Khan 1947 (2) SA 432 (N)

2. Ratio decidendi of the case: The relief sought in a sequestration application is
directed at diminishing the legal status and capacity of a particular individual
debtor, so it should pertain to that debtor’s circumstances only.

3. Area of Insolvency Law applicable: Compulsory Sequestration.

(b)

1. Case name: Ex Parte Arntzen (Nedbank Ltd as Intervening Creditor) 2013 (1)
SA 49 (KZP)

2. Ratio decidendi of the case: The court confirmed that voluntary surrender
applications must comply with the provisions in s 6(1) of the Act and the court
must be satisfied that it will be to the advantage of creditors if the debtor’s estate
is surrendered.

3. Area of Insolvency Law applicable: Sections 3-6 of the Insolvency Act 24 of
1936.

(c)

1. Case name: Harksen v Lane 1998 (1) SA 300 (CC)

2. Ratio decidendi of the case: Section 21 did not infringe the constitutional
provisions and the temporary divestment of the solvent spouse was merely to
ensure that the insolvent estate was not deprived of property to which it was
entitled.

3. Area of Insolvency Law applicable: Section 21 Insolvency Act 24 of 1936.

(d)

1. Case name: Strutfast (Pty) Ltd v Uys 2017 (6) SA 491 (GJ)

2. Ratio decidendi of the case: The definition of “employees” in section 9(4A)
includes all employees, as well as domestic employees.

Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without
any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as a result of
reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for comparison, research
and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any
form or by any means.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller iStudy. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $2.93. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

83684 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$2.93  35x  sold
  • (6)
  Add to cart