ISMPP CMPP Examination
Preparation 3 [Publications
management, publication ethics,
publication case studies]
ICMJE Authorship Criteria - -1. Substantial contribution to conception/design
of work OR acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data
2. Drafting work or revising it critically
3. Final approval for publication
4. Agree to be accountable for all aspects or work and address questions of
integrity
-True/False: Editors in chief have full authority over the entire editorial
content of their journal and timing of publication (adopted by ICMJE per
World Association of Medical Editors) - -True (Editorial freedom)
-A published article has an error of fact (this could have been pointed out by
a reader or journal staff or authors themselves) - What should the journal do?
- -Contact the authors, get correction approved by all authors, publish
correction with linking to the uncorrected article
-The publication has been updated with new data - what should be done
next/ - -This is a new publication for journal consideration
-A published article has an error of debatable facts (this usually is pointed
out by a reader) - What should the reader do? - -Write to the journal editor
and publish a Letter to the Editor article
-What are minimum standards for journal to publish a correction notice? (5)
- -1. Publish correction notice asap detailing changes from original pub,
citing the original pub, and indexed in Table of Contents
2. Journal should post new article version with dates of change and details of
changes
3. Archive old version
4. Previous electronic versions to make it clear that there is a more recent
version
5. Citation should be for new article
-What is "Publication replacement?" - -When an honest mistake has been
made in a publication that invalidates a paper's results, a republication with
corrected results may be submitted for further review and editorial scrutiny,
, allowing for retraction + republication with explanation for correction in the
literature.
-As an author/pubs professional, how would you choose a good preprint
archive? (6) - -1. Clearly identify preprints as work that is not peer reviewed;
2. Require authors to document disclosures of interest;
3. Require authors to indicate funding source(s);
4. Have a clear process for preprint archive users to notify archive
administrators about concerns related to posted preprints—a public
commenting feature is desirable for this purpose;
5. Maintain metadata for preprints that are withdrawn from posting and post
withdrawal notices indicating the timing and reason for withdrawal of a
preprint; and
6. Have a mechanism for authors to indicate when the preprint article has
been subsequently published in a peer-reviewed journal.
-What are the authors responsible for when submitting an article that is a
preprint? (2) - -1. Inform the journal that the work is on a preprint server
2. Ensure preprints are amended to point to subsequent published version
(but not reprint the published version)
-What is a secondary publication? (different from secondary manuscript) - -
Same article for a different audience.
ICMJE: Secondary publication of material published in other journals or online
may be justifiable and beneficial, especially when intended to disseminate
important information to the widest possible audience (e.g., guidelines
produced by government agencies and professional organizations in the
same or a different language).
When the same journal simultaneously publishes an article in multiple
languages, the MEDLINE citation will note the multiple languages (for
example, Angelo M. Journal networking in nursing: a challenge to be shared.
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2011 Dec 45[6]:1281-2,1279-80,1283-4. Article in
English, Portuguese, and Spanish. No abstract available. PMID: 22241182).
-Best practice ______________ selling advertisements intended to be
juxtaposed with editorial content on the same product - -prohibits
-Ghost writing - -Unacknowledged use of writing assistance for publications;
considered unacceptable
-Best practice for prior publication
1. Adhere to __________
2. Disclose _______
3. Explain ________________
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller wanjohip510. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $12.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
