Exam (elaborations)
LEB 320F Unit 4 Quiz with 100% correct Answers
- Course
- Institution
LEB 320F Unit 4 Quiz
[Show more]
Content preview
LEB 320F Unit 4 QuizIf someone does not become aware of an injury caused via the negligence of another for more than two years after the negligent act of another, their claim is not waived under the statute of limitations in most states. - Answer -True; Most states embrace a doctrine of tolling statute of limitations until the person becomes aware of their injury, within certain limitations.
Under the Lanham Act, a deceived consumer is generally the one to bring a suit against
the corporation. - Answer -False; It is generally competitors who, while redressing their own injuries, seek under the Lanham Act to end false advertising that also injures consumers.
In order to prove a claim of negligence, the plaintiff must establish: (1) that the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care, (2) that the defendant breached that duty of due care, (3) that the defendant's breach proximately caused the injury, and (4) that the plaintiff suffered injury. - Answer -True
A seller generally doesn't owe a different level of duty to a stranger than they do to a close friend. - Answer -False; Due to the level of trust and confidence between a seller and their close friend, they may be required to speak up. Failure to disclose, therefore, is more likely to constitute fraud if the plaintiff is a friend, a relative or a partner than if the plaintiff is a stranger.
Negligence per se can be applied when a court finds an act negligent because an individual has violated a statute. - Answer -True; Negligence per se is a doctrine that states that someone is necessarily negligent if they broke a certain statute, such as a speed limit, and then an accident occurred, such as a wreck. In situations such as these, the court will assume the defendant was acting negligently simply because they broke a law which was intended to prevent such accidents. To prevail, plaintiffs must still establish that the defendant owed a duty of care and that plaintiffs suffered injuries proximately caused by the breach of duty.
The primary difference between assault and battery is that assaults only involve apprehension while batteries are intrusions of the body. - Answer -True; Although modern courts and statutes frequently use the two terms interchangeably, technically a battery is a rude, inordinate contract with the person of another. An assault, basically, is any act that creates an apprehension of an imminent battery.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller millyphilip. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
83637 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now