Exam (elaborations)

Veiling_in_the_West_and_Biological_Essen

0 purchase

Course
Veiling_in_the_West_and_Biological_Essen

Institution
Veiling_in_the_West_and_Biological_Essen

Final Take Home Exam 1. Howhasveiling in Islam become so controversial in the West? If first impressions are unuttered looks and glances, often occurring through a quick observing of attire, posture, and physical demarcations, “clothing is probably the most silent of expressions used.” ...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 26 pages

View example

Uploaded on August 4, 2024
Number of pages 26
Written in 2024/2025
Type Exam (elaborations)
Contains Questions & answers

veilinginthewestandbiologicalessen
1 howhasveiling in islam become so controversial

Institution Veiling_in_the_West_and_Biological_Essen
Course Veiling_in_the_West_and_Biological_Essen

StudyCenter1 Member since 1 year 198 documents sold

$16.99

Add to cart

Save

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

ORVIETO-AGIMAN, Arielle

RELI 372

Professor Steven Lapidus

Sunday November 19th 2023

Final Take Home Exam

1. How has veiling in Islam become so controversial in the West?

If first impressions are unuttered looks and glances, often occurring through a quick observing of

attire, posture, and physical demarcations, “clothing is probably the most silent of expressions

used.” (Hoodfar, p.3) Dressing, which is often analyzed through the public sphere, is our first

communication between each other, our first informant. Veiling, therefore, is a loud statement in

a silenced discussion of looks.

Although “the first reference of veiling dates to an Assyrian legal text of the thirteenth century

BC” (Hoodfar, p.6), and that some have even speculated that certain “men started wearing a

Kippah, in religious response to Muslim veiling” (Cohn, 2022*), meaning that the gesture of

head-covering is not exclusive to one religion, nor is it isolated from interfaith influences; it is

important to designate the true issue at hand when debating “veiling in Islam in the West”:

policing brown and black women’s bodies.

Indeed, had this controversy had anything to do with “religious freedom”, “feminism”, “freedom

of choice”, or any other false pretense used to veil the true meaning of the debate, the discussion

would have never been narrowed and pinpointed so obviously to the hijab or burqa or chador or

niqab or abaya... It would have addressed secularism as a whole, which would mean removing

all religious symbols and references. But God forbid we change the Saints street names, paint in

,red and behead the omnipresent statues of the missionary colonizers, or take down crosses at

National Assemblies, right?

How could we ever laïcize the public sphere, if de-evangelizing the city would mean holding

History accountable and disaggregating the Christian symbols that have immiscer themselves in

all parts of “Western” cities?

This is to say, that somehow the imbricated, looming, systems of oppression, meaning the

Patriarchy, and Imperial-Colonialism (with their love child, Capitalism), managed to combine

new ways of maintaining their hegemonic powers, which was to find their newest antagonist and

arch nemesis: Islam. Yet being Islamophobic couldn’t have been enough to recruit followers to

their mission, the West had to find ways of first-wave feminizing their movement, that is to say,

internalized misogyny (with the “family-values” flavor of white supremacy). So not only is the

controversy Islamophobic, namely through “the tendency of Western scholarly work and the

colonial authorities to present a one-dimensional image of Islam” (Hoodfar, p.11), it is also

blatantly misogynistic, with its “lack of recognition of women’s agency, and the tendency to

view women as passive victims, that has flawed the current debate, distorted the image of veiled

women and promoted the divide between those who do and those who do not wear the hijab”.

(Hoodfar, p.39)

Therefore, to truly grasp how veiling in Islam has become so controversial in the West, we

must tackle two essential points: 1) Islam as the new Commie, or “the Clash of Civilizations”

and 2) Infantilizing women of color, the leftover sequelae of the Suffragettes.

, Let’s begin with: after the RedFear, and the War on Drugs, socialism-communism or any

community-oriented ideals have a new movement, except this time, it’s a Religion (rather than a

political party, figure, or monolithic state).

In the methodology manual “Understanding Religion: theories and methods for studying

religiously diverse societies” by Paul Hedges, is is said that:

“In the twenty-first century, many associate religion with violence, and as
contrary to whatever they imagine “Western values” to be. This critique of religion is
often leveled, especially against Islam. Many Muslims proclaim that theirs is “the
religion of peace”, and compatible with democracy, freedom, and human rights. An
inevitable confrontation between the West, often portrayed as Christian, and the Muslim-
majority world, was theorized by Samuel Huntington under the terminology of a “clash
of civilizations,” This suggests future fault lines lie between major civilizational blocs,
with three main ones being Western, Islamic and Confucian.” (Hedges, p.331)

Although the American (self-proclaimed Hero or Bearer of Western values) narrative does put

itself in opposition to “the Muslim-majority world” and countries, and to China, it is important to

identify a few flaws within this theorem.

Namely “the world’s largest Muslim-majority country is not in the Middle East; it is in Indonesia

an area which has seen centuries of relative religious harmony and peace compared to the rest of

the world.” (Hedges, p.331)

And more importantly, “suggestions that Islam is at war with the West can be met with a

response that it is, if anything a war of self-defence. Many Muslims have perceived the War in

Terror as primarily a Western cover to continue its “crusade” against Islam […] as part of

ongoing Christian-centric aggression against them”. (Hedges, p.331)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller StudyCenter1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $16.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

65646 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling

Exam (elaborations)

Veiling_in_the_West_and_Biological_Essen

Document information

Subjects

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview