Essay
LML4806 ASSIGNMENT 2 ANSWERS 2024 SEMESTER 2 (PRESCRIBED BOOK & STUDY GUIDE USED) //wa.me/
- Course
- Institution
LML4806 ASSIGNMENT 2 ANSWERS 2024 SEMESTER 2 (PRESCRIBED BOOK & STUDY GUIDE USED) //
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
fbinstitute7
Content preview
LML4806 ASSIGNMENT 2 2024SEMESTER 2
UNISA
COMPONY LAW
, 1|Page
QUESTION 1
Application to Set Aside a Creditor's Vote- Legal Framework and Analysis
Under South Africa's Companies Act 71 of 2008, particularly Chapter 6 which deals with
business rescue proceedings, a business rescue practitioner (BRP) like Barbara has specific
legal recourses when a creditor's vote may impede the successful rescue of a company. This
section outlines the relevant grounds, factors for consideration by the court, and potential
outcomes, supported by case law and statutory provisions.
Grounds for Application to Set Aside a Creditor's Vote
According to Section 153(1)(a)(ii) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008, a BRP can apply to a
court to set aside a creditor's vote on a business rescue plan if the vote is deemed
inappropriate, unreasonably prejudicial, or unjustifiably detrimental to the interests of
affected persons. The grounds for such an application may include:
1. Unreasonable or Inappropriate Voting Behavior- The BRP must demonstrate that the
vote cast by Winelands Packers (Pty) Ltd was not in good faith or was unreasonable
under the circumstances.
2. Detrimental Impact on Other Stakeholders- The BRP should show that the vote
negatively affects the interests of other creditors, employees, or other affected parties.
Relevant Factors for Court Consideration
In deciding whether to set aside a creditor's vote, the court typically evaluates several key
factors:
1. Interests of Affected Persons- The court assesses whether the vote unfairly prejudices
the interests of other creditors, shareholders, or employees. This is particularly
relevant in light of Section 7(k) of the Companies Act, which emphasizes the
protection of creditors and other stakeholders.
2. Viability of the Business Rescue Plan-The court considers whether the proposed plan
offers a reasonable prospect of rescuing the company. The Oakdene Square Properties
(Pty) Ltd v Farm Bothasfontein (Kyalami) (Pty) Ltd and Others 2013 (4) SA 539
(SCA) case highlighted the importance of a plan's reasonableness and practicality.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller fbinstitute7. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $17.73. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
73314 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now