MRL2601 ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO - SEMESTER 2 - 2024 - UNISA - DUE : 27 AUGUST 2024 - ( FULLY REFERENCED WITH FOOTNOTES - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED)
MRL2601 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 (867833) - DUE 27 August 2024 ; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
All for this textbook (25)
Written for
University of South Africa
Entrepreneurial Law (MRL2601)
All documents for this subject (20)
Seller
Follow
TBSTUVIA
Reviews received
Content preview
MLR2601 ASSIGNMENT 1
SEMESTER 2 2024 DUE
27 AUGUST 2024
, MRL2601 Assignment 1
QUESTION 1 Explain, with reference to relevant prescribed case law for this module, how
the court determines whether a specific business is a partnership. (10)
To determine whether a specific business is a partnership, South African courts typically refer to
the criteria set out in both statutory law and case law. A partnership is defined as a contract
between two or more persons who agree to combine their resources or efforts for a joint
purpose, with the intention of sharing profits. The key elements that courts consider to identify a
partnership include the following:
1. Agreement: There must be an agreement, whether written, oral, or implied by conduct,
among the partners.
2. Contribution: Each partner must contribute something to the partnership, which could
be money, property, or skills.
3. Profit-sharing: The partners must have an intention to share the profits of the business.
4. Mutual Agency: Each partner must act as an agent of the others, having the authority to
bind the partnership in transactions with third parties.
5. Objective: The partnership must be carried out for a lawful purpose.
Relevant case law helps elucidate these principles:
1. Pezzutto v Dreyer [1992] (3) SA 379 (A)
In this case, the court held that merely sharing profits is not conclusive evidence of a
partnership. The court emphasized the importance of mutual agency and joint control over the
business. The presence of an agreement to share losses is also indicative of a partnership.
2. Joubert v Tarry & Co [1915] AD 1
This case highlighted the importance of intention among the parties to create a partnership. The
court considered the agreement between the parties, their conduct, and how they presented
their business relationship to the outside world.
3. Purdon v Muller [1961] (2) SA 211 (A)
The court in this case analyzed whether the parties had a mutual right to manage and control
the business. The presence of equal control and decision-making power was a strong indicator
of a partnership.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller TBSTUVIA. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $2.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.