Exam (elaborations)
LEB 320F Final Exam Questions and Correct Answer
- Course
- Institution
LEB 320F Final Exam Questions and Correct Answer
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
ELSCORES: Tuesday, 20 August 2024LEB 320F Final Exam Questions and
Correct Answer
In the featured case Kelo v. City of New London, a town in Connecticut took action in a
distressed area with high unemployment. It sought to use eminent domain to acquire land
from several landowners who did not wish to sell their land. The primary Constitutional issue
in the case was...
A. Equal Protection
B. Procedural Due Process
C. Free Speech
D. The Takings Clause
E. The Commerce Clause
✓ :- D. The Takings Clause
Alan buys a new laptop at Best Buy for $600. Betty buys an acre of land for $6,000. Carol
signs up for a year of cable TV service, and pre-pays $600. Which of these agreements will
be governed by Article Two of the Uniform Commercial Code?
A. Alan's only
B. Betty's only
C. Carol's only
DO NOT COPY AND PASTE!!
,ELSCORES: Tuesday, 20 August 2024
D. A and B
✓ :- A. Alan's only
Fred took a photograph of a bright light in the sky in 2005. Five years later, in 2010, it
generated significant interest when it was included in a television special about UFOs and
alien visitors hosted by the guy who played Commander Riker on Star Trek. In 2012, Fred
passed away. When will the copyright on Fred's photo expire?
A. 2075
B. 2080
C. 2082
✓ :- C. 2082
Bill files a Federal lawsuit based on his 1st Amendment right to free speech in a district court.
When he loses the case, he appeals to a U.S. Court of Appeals, and he is again unsuccessful.
He now wants the U.S. Supreme Court to review his case. Will he be able to do so?
A. Yes, absolutely, because his case is based on a Constitutional liberty.
B. Yes, but only if the Supreme Court grants a writ of certiorari.
C. Yes, but only if he is seeking at least $75,000 in damages.
D. No, absolutely not.
✓ :- B. Yes, but only if the Supreme Court grants a writ of certiorari.
DO NOT COPY AND PASTE!!
,ELSCORES: Tuesday, 20 August 2024
Walter, a Texan, makes a sale of goods contract with Wilhelm, a citizen of Germany. Walter
is the seller, and Wilhelm is the buyer. The contract does not say anything in particular about
which body of contract law will be applied to resolve any future disputes over the deal.
Which of the following bodies of law governs the contract?
A. Texas common law
B. German law
C. The CISG
D. Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code
✓ :- C. The CISG
Rex wrecks his car in a collision with Collison. Much later, in a negligence lawsuit, the jury
determines that the accident was 67% Rex's fault and 33% Collison's fault. Rex will be able
to recover some damages if he lives in a state that follows...
A. contributory negligence
B. "modified" comparative negligence
C. "pure" comparative negligence
D. none of the above
✓ :- C. "pure" comparative negligence
Roger has created an energy drink that he hopes will become popular, and he wants to protect
his intellectual property. Specifically, he wants to protect the drink's "secret formula", or
recipe, and he also wants to protect his logo, which is a cartoonish drawing of a stick man
DO NOT COPY AND PASTE!!
, ELSCORES: Tuesday, 20 August 2024
with steam blowing out of his ears. Which of these things will Roger probably be able to
trademark?
A. The secret formula only
B. The logo only
C. Both A and B
D. None of the above
✓ :- B. The logo only
In the featured case Leonard v. PepsiCo, recall that Leonard saw a television ad in which a
student landed a Harrier Jet at his high school, and a subtitle indicated that the cost of the jet
was "7 million Pepsi Points". The plaintiff then sought to acquire 7 million Pepsi Points and
to require Pepsi to hand over the plane. The appellate court decided that...
A. Pepsi had not made an offer, and no contract existed.
B. Leonard had not accepted the offer, and no contract existed.
C. There was no consideration to support deal, so no contract existed.
D. A contract existed, and Pepsi was obligated to acquire a Harrier Jet for Leonard.
E. A contract existed, and Leonard was entitled to damages but not a Harrier Jet.
✓ :- A. Pepsi had not made an offer, and no contract existed.
DO NOT COPY AND PASTE!!
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Examify. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $11.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
81113 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now