100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
BUSN 4650 Real Exam|Questions & 100% Solutions (Verified Answers $12.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

BUSN 4650 Real Exam|Questions & 100% Solutions (Verified Answers

 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • BUSN 4650
  • Institution
  • BUSN 4650

Ms. Reeves worked for city councilman, she decided to run against him, took time off work due to medical issues and he thought she was campaigning so fired her - Title VII says nothing about medical discrimination - Court ruled: NOT a violation of Title VII - Reeves v. City of Yonkers - Mr. Har...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • August 24, 2024
  • 8
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • BUSN 4650
  • BUSN 4650
avatar-seller
KenAli
BUSN 4650 Real Exam|Questions &
100% Solutions (Verified Answers)

- Ms. Reeves worked for city councilman, she decided to run against him, took time off work due
to medical issues and he thought she was campaigning so fired her

- Title VII says nothing about medical discrimination

- Court ruled: NOT a violation of Title VII - ✔✔Reeves v. City of Yonkers



- Mr. Harrell was a letter carrier, had to work rotating Saturdays but couldn't because he is a Seventh
Day Adventist, they offered him a few hours off but he declined

- granting Harrell leave for Saturday shifts would have caused his co-workers an undue hardship

- Court ruled: NOT a violation of Title VII - ✔✔Harrell v. Donahue



- Bostock was a child welfare advocate until it was discovered he played on a softball team for gay men
and got fired

- if Bostock's sex was a woman, it would be discrimination based on sex because he wouldn't be fired for
liking a man if he was a woman

- impossible to discriminate against a person for sexual orientation without discriminating on the
basis of sex

- Court ruled violation of Title VII - ✔✔Bostock v. Clayton County



Age Discrimination in Employment Act: prohibits discrimination and forced retirements against
those above age 40, only applies to firms with 20+ employees - ✔✔ADEA



disparate treatment and disparate impact - ✔✔ADEA recognizes both



a reasonable factor other than age - ✔✔ADEA does not require proof of business necessity, all that
is needed is:



Americans with Disabilities Act:

, - prevents employers from requiring pre-employment medical examination or asking question's about
the applicant's medical history


- prohibits employer discrimination against applicants and employees on the basis of having a
disability or regarded as having a disability - ✔✔ADA



reasonable accomodations - ✔✔under the ADA, an employer must make
____________________________



- PGA denied Casey Martin his request to use a golf cart in tournament, Martin has disease that
makes long walks painful and impossible

- PGA claims this would fundamentally alter the event

- under Title III a company does not have to give reasonable accommodation when it fundamentally
alters the event/company

- Court ruled: violation of ADA, Martin using the golf cart would not fundamentally alter the event
- ✔✔PGA Tour v. Martin



- Jewish woman wore ankle-length skirt to health club for religious reasons, violated the club's
dress policy, club canceled her membership

- Title II only recognizes disparate treatment, this was disparate impact

- Court ruled: NOT a violation of Title II - ✔✔Jalal v. Lucille Robert Health Clubs



- Mr. Fall practices Islam and prayed in the corner of the locker room, LA Fitness demanded he
stop praying

- Title II prevents businesses from denying services, LA Fitness never denied a service and had a neutral
religious policy

- Court ruled: NOT a violation of Title II - ✔✔Fall v. LA Fitness



- City of Jackson gave raises to its police force, with older officers receiving smaller raises than
younger officers, goal was to bring salaries in competition with surrounding areas

- age discrimination is permitted where differentiation based on reasonable factors other than age

- Court ruled: NOT a violation, based on RFOA - ✔✔Smith v. City of Jackson

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller KenAli. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $12.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

78799 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$12.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart