Exam (elaborations)
ACRP – CP Exam (Latest 2024 – 2025) With Complete Solution
- Course
- Institution
ACRP – CP Exam (Latest 2024 – 2025) With Complete Solution
[Show more]
Content preview
ACRP – CP Exam (Latest 2024 – 2025)With Complete Solution
BelmontsReports(1979)s-
sethicalsprinciplessandsguidelinessforsthesprotectionsofshumanssubjectssofsresearch.
respectsforspersonss-
sindividualssshouldsbestreatedsassautonomoussagentssandspersonsswithsdiminishedsautonom
ysaresentitledstosprotection
Ansautonomousspersons-
sAspersonscapablesofsdeliberationsaboutspersonalsgoalssandsofsactingsundersthesdirectionsofss
uchsdeliberation
Beneficences-sDosnotsharmsandsmaximizespossiblesbenefitssandsminimizespossiblesharms
Justices-
s1)stoseachspersonsansequalsshares2)stoseachspersonsaccordingstosindividualsneeds3)stoseachs
personsaccordingstosindividualsefforts4)stoseachspersonsaccordingstossocietalscontributionss5
)stoseachspersonsaccordingstosmerit
Justices-
s·sThesselectionsofsresearchssubjectssneedsstosbesscrutinizedsinsorderstosdetermineswhethers
somesclassessaresbeingssystematicallysselectedssimplysbecausesofstheirseasysavailability,sthei
rscompromisedsposition,sorstheirsmanipulability,srathersthansforsreasonssdirectlysrelatedstos
thesproblemsbeingsstudied.
Justices-
s·sWheneversresearchssupportedsbyspublicsfundssleadsstosthesdevelopmentsofstherapeuticsde
vicessandsprocedures,sjusticesdemandssbothsthatsthesesnotsprovidesadvantagessonlystosthose
swhoscansaffordsthemsandsthatssuchsresearchsshouldsnotsundulysinvolvespersonssfromsgroup
ssunlikelystosbesamongsthesbeneficiariessofssubsequentsapplicationssofsthesresearch.
Threeselementssofsthesconsentsprocesss-sinformation,scomprehension,svoluntariness
Whatsissansexamplesofshowsthesprinciplesofsbeneficencescansbesappliedstosasstudysemploying
shumanssubjectss-
sDeterminingsthesstudyshassasmaximizationsofsbenefitssandsasminimizationsofsrisks
WhatsaresthesthreesprinciplessdiscussedsinsthesBelmontsReport?s-
sRespectsforspersons,sbeneficence,sjustice
,ThesBelmontsReport'ssprinciplesofsrespectsforspersonssincorporatessatsleasts2sethicalsconvict
ions:sfirst,sthatsindividualssshouldsbestreatedsassautonomoussagents,sandssecond,sthat:s-
sPersonsswithsdiminishedsautonomysaresentitledstosprotection
NurembergsCodes(1947)s-
s1)sasrequirementssforsvoluntarysconsents2)sthesresearchsmustshavesscientificsmerits3)sThesb
enefitssofsthesresearchsmustsoutweighsthesriskss4)sSubjectsshavesthesabilitystosterminatespar
ticipationsinsthesresearchsatsanystime
NationalsResearchsActs(1974)s-
s1)sAuthorizedsthescreationsofsthesNationalsCommissionsforsthesProtectionsofsHumansSubject
ssofsBiomedicalsandsBehavioralsResearch,swhichswasschargedswithsdevelopingsansethicalscod
esandsguidelinessforsresearcherss2)sRequiredsthesestablishmentsofsIRBssatsorganizationssrec
eivingsPHSssupportsforshumanssubject'ssresearch
ThesNationalsCommissions(1975-1978s-
sIssuedsasseriessofsreportssonsvulnerablespopulationss(suchsassfetuses,schildren,sprisoners,sa
ndsthes"mentallysinfirm")spsychosurgery,sIRBs,sandsotherstopicssthatsincludedsrecommenda
tionssforsregulatingshumanssubjects'sresearch.sThesesrecommendationsshadssignificantsinflu
encesonsthesdevelopmentsofsthesfederalsregulationssgoverningshumanssubjectsresearch.
45sCFRs46s-
sAlsosknownsassthesCommonsRule,sthisslegislationsestablishedsthesrolesofsinstitutionalsrevie
wsboardss(IRBs)sforsresearchsonshumansrights.
Additionalsprotectionsforsthesesindividualssinsresearchs-
s1)spregnantswomen,shumansfetuses,sandsneonatess2)schildrens3)sprisoners
21sCFRs50s-sInformedsConsent
21sCFRs56s-sIRB
21sCFRs812s-sInvestigationalsMedicalsDevices
21sCFRs312s-sInvestigationalsDrugssandsBiologics
DeclarationsofsHelsinkis(1964)s-
sRecommendationssguidingsmedicalsdoctorssinsbiomedicalsresearchsinvolvingshumanssubjec
ts
WHOsGuideliness(1996)sStandardssandsOperationalsGuidancesforsEthicssReviewsofsHealth-
relatedsResearchswithsHumansParticipants"s-
sDocumentssdesignedstosservesassinternationalsguidelinessforsthesreviewsandsconductsofsres
earchsinvolvingshumanssubjects
ICHsE6s-sGuidelinesforsGoodsClinicalsPractice
,ThesusesofsprisonerssinsresearchsissasconcernsundersthesBelmontsprinciplesforsJusticesbecaus
e:s-sPrisonerssmaysnotsbesusedstosconductsresearchsthatsonlysbenefitsstheslargerssociety
WhatswassthesresultsofsthesBeechersarticle?s-
sRealizationsthatsethicalsabusessaresnotslimitedstosthesNazisregime
Issuedsins1974,s45sCFRs46sraisedstosregulatorysstatus:s-sUSsPublicsHealthsServicesPolicy
WhatsissincludedsinsthesNurembergsCode?s-sInformedsconsent
InformedsconsentsissconsideredsansapplicationsofswhichsBelmontsprinciple?s-
sRespectsforspersons
IRBs(InstitutionalsReviewsBoard)s-
sAsreviewscommitteesestablishedstoshelpsprotectsthesrightssandswelfaresofshumansresearchss
ubjects
Regulationssrequire:s-
sIRBsreviewsandsapprovalsforsresearchsinvolvingshumanssubjectssifsitsissconducted,ssupporte
d,sorsregulatedsbysUSsfederalsdepartmentssandsagencies
FederalsregulationssstipulatesthatsansIRBscan:s-
sApprovesresearch,srequiresmodifications,sdisapprovesresearch,sconductscontinuingsreviews
,sverifysnosmaterialschangessoccurredssincesprevioussreview,sobserve,ssuspend/terminatesa
pproval
Conveyedscommitteesreviews-
sFullscommitteesreview.sStandardstypesofsreviewsdescribedsinsthesfederalsregulations.sMusts
besusedsforsthesinitialsreviewsofsallsstudiessthatsaresnotseligiblesforsexpeditedsreviewsorsexe
mption
Expeditedsreviews-
sCansbesusedsforsestablishedscategoriessandsminorschangessinspreviouslysapprovedsresearch,
sandsforslimitedsIRBsreviewsofsselectsexemptionscategories
Categoriessforsexpeditedsreview:s-s1)sThesresearchsdoessnotsinvolvesmoresthansminimalsrisks
2)sThesentiresresearchsprojectsmustsbesconsistentswithsonesorsmoresofsthesfederallysdefineds
categoriess(IND/IDEsnotesrequired)
TypessofsIRBssubmissionss-s1)sApplicationsforsinitialsreviews
2)sApplicationsforscontinuingsreview:sIRBsmustsre-
reviewsgreatersthansminimalsrisksnotslesssthansoncespersyears
3)sAmendmentssorsmodifications
4)sReportssofsunanticipatedsproblems
, USsDepartmentsofsHealthsandsHumansServicess-sResponsiblesfors45sCFRs46
NationalsInstitutessofsHealths(NIH)s-
sIncludessfundingsagenciessthatsprovidesfederalsfundingsforsbiomedicalsresearch
U.S.sFoodsandsDrugsAdministrations(FDA)s-
sOverseessthesusesofsallsdrugs,sdevices,sbiologics,setc.sincludingstheirsusesinsresearchswithshu
manssubjects
InternationalsCouncilsforsHarmonisations(ICH)s-sofferssGPsguidelines
Assubjectsinsasclinicalsresearchstrialsexperiencessasserious,sunanticipatedsadversesdrugsexper
ience.sHowsshouldsthesinvestigatorsproceed,swithsrespectstosthesIRB,saftersthesdiscoverysofst
hesadverseseventsoccurrence?s-
sReportsthesadversesdrugsexperiencesinsastimelysmanner,sinskeepingswithsthesIRB'sspoliciessa
ndsprocedures,susingsthesformssorsthesmechanismsprovidedsbysthesIRB
Howslongsissansinvestigatorsrequiredstoskeepsconsentsdocuments,sIRBscorrespondence,sands
researchsrecords?s-sAsminimumsofsthreesyearssafterscompletionsofsthesstudy
Accordingstosfederalsregulations,swhichsofsthesfollowingsbestsdescribesswhensexpeditedsrevi
ewsofsasnew,sproposedsstudysmaysbesusedsbysthesIRB?s-
sThesstudysinvolvessnosmoresthansminimalsrisksandsmeetssonesofsthesallowablescategoriessof
sexpeditedsreviewsspecifiedsinsfederalsregulations
AmendmentssinvolvingschangesstosIRBsapprovedsprotocolssdosNOTsneedspriorsIRBsapproval
sif:s-sTheschangessmustsbesimmediatelysimplementedsforstheshealthsandswell-
beingsofsthessubjects
IRBscontinuingsreviewsofsasgreatersthansminimalsrisksapprovedsprotocolsthatsisscurrentlysen
rollingssubjectssmust:s-soccursatsleastsannually
Informedsconsents-
sThesprocesssthatsbeginsswithsthesrecruitmentsandsscreeningsofsassubjectsandsthessigningsofst
hesconsentsdocumentsandscontinuessthroughoutsthessubject'ssinvolvementsinsthesresearchsa
ndsbeyondsstudystermination
InformedsconsentsissmandatedsbysthesUSsDepartmentsofsHHSsats45sCFRs46sandsthesUSsFDAsa
ts21sCFRs50.sThesesregulationssweresdevelopedsto:s-
s1)sprotectshumanssubjectss2)sEnsuresthatspotentialsstudyssubjectssclearlysunderstandsthesb
enefitssandsriskssassociatedswithstheirsparticipationsinsasstudys3)sProvidesthespotentialsstud
yssubjectsswithsallsinformationsneededstosreachsasdecisionsonswhethersorsnotstosparticipatesi
nsasresearchsstudy
Broadsconsents-sProspectivesconsentsforsunspecifiedsfuturesresearch
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Futurenurses. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $10.29. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
84669 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now