BLAW 3310: Exam 2 Practice Questions and
Answers (100% Pass)
The applicability of the Parol Evidence Rule presupposes? - Answer️️ -an
integrated contract
A contract for the purchase and sale of illegal drugs - Answer️️ -is void
If a minor enters into a contract the contract is - Answer...
BLAW 3310: Exam 2 Practice Questions and
Answers (100% Pass)
The applicability of the Parol Evidence Rule presupposes? - Answer✔️✔️-an
integrated contract
A contract for the purchase and sale of illegal drugs - Answer✔️✔️-is void
If a minor enters into a contract the contract is - Answer✔️✔️-voidable
A promise without consideration - Answer✔️✔️-is not a contract
Which of the following is an example of objective impossibility of
performance? - Answer✔️✔️-The famous tenor, Lungs LaRue, is unable to
sing in an opera because influenza has caused him to temporarily lose his
voice.
For a promise to be contractually binding on the promisor, it must be
supported by legally sufficient consideration? - Answer✔️✔️-True
The parol evidence tule applies - Answer✔️✔️-only to integrated contracts
Consideration must involve the exchange of money. - Answer✔️✔️-false
Which of the following statements is true? - Answer✔️✔️-None of the above
A contract for the sale land - Answer✔️✔️-is governed by the common law
A contract for the sale of goods - Answer✔️✔️-is governed by Article 2 of the
Uniform Commercial Code.
Which of the following does not violate the parol evidence rule? -
Answer✔️✔️-extrinsic evidence of fraud
Questions 14 & 15:
Phoebe sweet went was interested in buying a used car which Oliver
Ozone had for sale. While in the process of test driving the car, Phoebe
asked Oliver whether or not the car had ever been in a wreck. Oliver knew
nothing of the history of the car before he bought it, but he answered
Phoebe's question by stating: "No. This car has never been in a wreck."
Although it had been repaired, it was worth much less than the value it
would have been if it had not been in the wreck. When Phoebe learned the
truth, she filed a lawsuit against Oliver Ozone seeking damages for fraud. -
Answer✔️✔️-
Under these fact - Answer✔️✔️-Phoebe can make a case for constructive
fraud.
Under these facts - Answer✔️✔️-(a) Oliver could be liable for compensatory
damages.
(b) Oliver could be liable for punitive damages.
(c) both a and b. (answer)
2
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller SophiaBennett. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
