Nopixel Case Law Exam Questions & Answers 2024/2025
13 views 0 purchase
Course
Nopixel Case Law
Institution
Nopixel Case Law
Nopixel Case Law Exam Questions & Answers 2024/2025
Reasonable Suspicion - ANSWERSis a reasonable presumption that a crime has been, is being, or will be committed. It is a reasonable belief based on facts or circumstances and is informed by a police officer's training and experience. Reasonab...
Nopixel Case Law Exam Questions &
Answers 2024/2025
Reasonable Suspicion - ANSWERSis a reasonable presumption that a crime has been, is being, or will be
committed. It is a reasonable belief based on facts or circumstances and is informed by a police officer's
training and experience. Reasonable suspicion is seen as more than a guess or hunch but less than
probable cause.
probable cause - ANSWERSis the logical belief, supported by facts and circumstances, that a crime has
been, is being, or will be committed.
Terry v. Ohio - ANSWERSAn officer with reasonable suspicion that the suspect has commited, is
committing or may be about to commit a crime, and that the suspect is armed and dangerous, may
conduct a 'stop and frisk' on a suspect without probable cause to arrest. Reasonable suspicion must be
based on "Specific and articulable facts" not just a hunch.
Brendlin v. California - ANSWERSSimilar to "Whren v. US", this case law covers that a lawful traffic stop is
an act of detention but also includes the passengers of the vehicle. No one in the car, driver or passenger
is free to depart without police permission.
Whren v. US - ANSWERSAn automobile is allowed to be reasonably stopped if officers have probable
cause to believe that a traffic violation has occurred even if the officer has no intent on traffic
enforcement. A traffic stop is also a form of detention with reasonable suspicion.
Pennsylvania v. Mimms - ANSWERSAn officer may order a driver out of an automobile after a lawfully
detained traffic stop under the justification of officers safety and / or to conduct a pat down to check for
weapons. Must meet the same criteria as Terry v. Ohio.
Maryland v Wilson - ANSWERSSimilar to "Pennsylvania v. Mimms", however aimed as passengers of
automobiles, officers can lawfully order passengers of a lawfully stopped automobile to exit and be
patted down. Must meet the same criteria as Terry v. Ohio.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Bensuda. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
