LSAT - Logical Reasoning 2024/2025 exam with correct exam
2 views 0 purchase
Course
LSAT - Logical Reasoning
Institution
LSAT - Logical Reasoning
Premise correct answersA fact, proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made
Conclusion correct answersA statement or judgment that follows from one or more reasons.
Conditional Reasoning correct answersA conditional statement is, in its most easily recognized form, an "if...then.....
Premise correct answersA fact, proposition or statement from which a conclusion is made
Conclusion correct answersA statement or judgment that follows from one or more reasons.
Conditional Reasoning correct answersA conditional statement is, in its most easily recognized form, an
"if...then..." statement. The following is, for example, a conditional statement. Conditional statements
are also described in terms of sufficient and necessary conditions.
Sufficient correct answersAn event or circumstance whose occurrence indicates that a necessary
condition must also occur.
Necessary correct answersAn event or circumstance whose occurrence is required in order for a
sufficient condition to occur.
Explain Sufficient Necessary correct answersIf a sufficient condition occurs, you automatically know that
the necessary condition also occurs. If a necessary condition occurs, then it is possible that the sufficient
condition will occur, but not certain.
Example of Sufficient Necessary correct answersBanging my shin on the table is all that is needed for me
to scream in pain (i.e. it is sufficient), so banging my shin is considered the sufficient condition. I cannot
bang my shin on the table without screaming in pain (screaming necessarily follows the banging of my
shin), so screaming in pain is the necessary condition. You should be fine if you can simply remember
that the antecedent (the phrase following the "if") is the sufficient condition for the consequent (the
phrase following the "then") and the consequent is the necessary condition for the antecedent.
Contra-positive correct answersa conditional statement derived from another by negating and
interchanging antecedent and consequent
Premise Indicators correct answersBecause
Since
, For
For example
For that reason that In that
Given that
As indicated by
Due to
Owing to
This can be seen from
We know this by
Conclusion Indicators correct answersThus
Therefore
Hence
Consequently
As a result
So
Accordingly
Clearly
Must be that
Shows that
Conclude that
Follows that
For this reason
Thirteen Logical Reasoning Types correct answers1. Must Be True / Most Supported
2. Main Point
3. Point at issue
4. Assumption
5. Justify the conclusion
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller QUILLSKY. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $14.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
