Exam (elaborations)
venture capital exam 1 with verified solutions
- Course
- Institution
venture capital exam 1 with verified solutions
[Show more]
Content preview
venture capital exam 1Yale investment philosophy - correct answer ✔✔active oversight on 3rd party managers, believe in
equities, tactical asset allocation, prefers separately managed account vs pooled assets, top tier PE
funds, understand PE market.
U.S Public equity - correct answer ✔✔pros- very liquid, more information available (ease of monitoring),
could help diversify out of illiquid sectors, easy to build hedging ( risk-management) strategies
cons- many analysts(more efficient, no advantage as info is public), many managers in this investment
space, may have to mid-cap or small-cap for inefficiencies, smaller ownership in a public situation,
perhaps less opportunity for returns- fairly efficient.
U.S Private equity - correct answer ✔✔pros- historically high returns, diversification/ low correlation,
already in best funds (may not be able to get back if leave), use some new firms that are "hungry" (but
risk here too)
cons- high risk(standard deviance) already a lot invested here, PE oversaturated with BO deals, illiquid,
Boom+Bust cycles (can the returns last?), some funds adding services
foreign equity (both public and private) - correct answer ✔✔pros- diversification potential, emerging
markets could be a new area for high returns, inefficiencies.
cons- few managers that are independent (Europe), emerging markets could be dangerous and volatile,
can Yale apply current oversight skills?
fixed income securities - correct answer ✔✔pros- liquid, less risk, cushion/ diversification
cons- lower returns, manager fees eat in already, may not hedge against inflation.
, hedge funds (absolute return) - correct answer ✔✔pros- high returns possible, another inefficient
investment space, leverage can help!
cons- derivative products can be misused, black box, leverage can hurt!, how to benchmark?, already
have large investment in space.
real assets - correct answer ✔✔pros- diversification, some value spaced ventures that aren't pure
exploration, may be able to back new partnerships, more control
cons- manager fee structure historically different (transaction fees), aggressive market thing in real
estate, already have large investment.
characteristics to exist in Yale PE Funds. - correct answer ✔✔independent (non-institutional) ownership -
did not want fund to have to share profits with institution that owned them and management team
leaves, clearly defined process, co-investment from GPs, incentive tied to performance- rather give more
in performance on back end than in mgmt fee).
private equity as an overall portfolio construction decision. - correct answer ✔✔high performance
potential, diversification (low correlation to other assets, how else to beat out peers?), performance.
mayfield's proposal - correct answer ✔✔partnership amendment whereby much of the clawback would
be paid by charging limited partners the difference between what they had paid in management fees,
and the 2.5% maximum that they could have been charged; asking for a cumulative payment (fee-for-
clawback exchange). They had been looking for a 2.5% fee (no more budgets) and a 30% carried interest
structure. for funds 8 and 9, calculated the amount of fees that could have been charged the vintage
year and exchange that amount against the clawback payment.
Typical compensation for Buyout and VC Funds. - correct answer ✔✔management fee + carried interest.
Larger funds could generate higher fees and could manage several funds. Reputation a key factor in
determining pay. venture capital: 2.5%+30%, buyouts: 2%+20%.
management fee - correct answer ✔✔LP-friendly, usually paid quarterly, supported a firm's daily
operations, usually calculated as a % of committed capital. LPs liked budget based fees due to
transparency but few VC firms willing to disclose expenses that would be required, typically less than
what asset-based fee would be.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller BravelRadon. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $12.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
77016 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now