100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Roessing Exam 4 LEGL 2700 Court Cases fully solved & verified for accuracy 2025 $14.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Roessing Exam 4 LEGL 2700 Court Cases fully solved & verified for accuracy 2025

 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • UGA Legal 2700
  • Institution
  • UGA Legal 2700

Roessing Exam 4 LEGL 2700 Court Cases fully solved & verified for accuracy 2025

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • September 18, 2024
  • 4
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • UGA Legal 2700
  • UGA Legal 2700
avatar-seller
GUARANTEEDSUCCESS
Roessing Exam 4 LEGL 2700 Court
Cases fully solved & verified for
accuracy 2025(GUARANTEED
SUCCESS).

Alli v. US (2008) - answer Veil-Piercing Case: pierced corporate veil
for co-mingled funds. Dr. Alli sued the US department of Housing for
failure to pay housing assistance for residents of three apartment
complexes. They owned these complexes and it was found that they
were not treating the corporation as a separate entity. They also
failed to adhere to obligations to keep the properties in decent and
safe conditions.


Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014) - answer Allowed closely-held, for-
profit corporations to be exempt from a law its owners religiously
object to if there is a less restrictive means of furthering the law's
interest.


Marchand v. Barnhill (2019) - answer Derivative Lawsuit: brought by
minority shareholders. Complaint that management at Blue Bell
turns a blind eye to the red flags given by regulators. The court
determined Blue Bell did not do enough to ensure the safety of its
products.


Francis V. Lorenzo v. Securities and Exchange Commission (2019) -
answer Lorenzo sent emails to potential investors containing
information about the value of Waste2Energy that he knew was
inaccurate. The intellectual property of the company did not work,
and was not worth $10 million as the email had suggested. The
email also did not include the disclosure of less than $400k in
assets. Although Lorenzo's boss created the emails, Lorenzo sent
them, which spread misinformation. He therefore is liable since he
knowingly disseminated false information to potential investors.
This expanded on the SEC's enforcement powers.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller GUARANTEEDSUCCESS. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $14.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77333 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$14.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart