Solutions Manual for Business and Professional Ethics, 9th Edition by Leonard J. Brooks
12 views 0 purchase
Course
Business Ethics
Institution
Business Ethics
Solutions Manual for Business and Professional Ethics, 9th Edition by Leonard J. Brooks. Complete chapters Solutions are included (Chapter 1 to 8)
CHAPTER 1: ETHICS EXPECTATIONS
CHAPTER 2: ETHICS & GOVERNANCE SCANDALS
CHAPTER 3: ETHICAL BEHAVIOR—PHILOSOPHERS’ CONTRIBUTIONS
CHAPTER 4: PRAC...
Note: The Chapters in this document are displayed in reverse order, with
the last chapter appearinf first. This change ensures all chapters are
included in this document. Feel free to preview first few pages for this
solutions manual to verify the document. Thanks for your attention.
,Business & Professional Ethics
for Directors, Executives &
Accountants, 9e
Case Solutions.........................................................................7
, Page |2
Chapter Questions
1. How much and in which ways did unbridled self-interest contribute to the subprime lending crisis?
Almost everyone in the subprime mortgage meltdown was only looking after their own narrow
self-interest and not the board interest of their clients or the economy.
• The homeowners, who knew that they could not afford to own a home, were ignoring
the fact that the when the mortgage came up for renewal they would not be able to
afford to pay the renewed mortgage at its higher interest rate.
• The sales agents, who were only concerned with making commissions on sales, were not
looking out for the best interest of their clients who could not afford these homes and
mortgages.
• The banks were only interested in generating higher interest revenue, without looking at
the credit worthiness of the borrowers and the risks associated with defaults.
• The investors who bought the high yield mortgage-backed securities were ignoring their
fiscal responsibilities by not conducting due diligence on the risks associated with these
securities.
2. How could increased regulation improve the exercise of unbridled self-interest in decision making?
Market failures often occur when there is an inefficient allocation of costs and benefits.
Externalities are costs or benefits that are borne by third parties, i.e., parties who are not part of
the initial contract. An example is air pollution: it is a cost that is borne by society. The
marketplace is unable to control pollution and so government regulation is required. The
collapse of the subprime mortgage market and the associated collapse of the mortgage-backed
securities market are also examples of market failures. Increased government regulation may
have helped to prevent or minimize the negative aspects of these market failures. For example,
Canadian banking regulations prevent Canadian chartered banks from being over-leveraged,
whereas the American banks had no similar legislative constraints. Many American banks failed
as a result of the crisis, but no Canadian banks failed. Although many managers do not like to
have their managerial discretion constrained through government regulation, legislation can be
useful when people forget their responsibilities to the rest of society, or when the opportunity
for unrealistic gain is too great.
3. How could ethical considerations improve unbridled self-interest in ethical decision making?
Ethics help to constrain unbridled self-interest by broadening the decision maker’s horizon.
Decisions have impacts on a variety of stakeholders, including the decision maker. When the
decision maker takes into account the interests of other stakeholders, then the decision maker
Business & Professional Ethics for Directors, Executives & Accountants, 9e
Leonard J. Brooks and Paul Dunn,
, Page |3
is less likely to make a decision that only helps the decision maker at the expense of the other
stakeholders.
4. Identify and explain five examples where executives or directors faced moral hazards and did not
deal with them ethically.
• Creating securities that had no hope of being realizable
• Selling very risky securities without disclosing the risks fully
• Paying incredibly excessive remuneration based on questionable incentives
• Banking on the fact that their company was to big to fail and endangering investors as well
as costing bailout funds
5. How much should the exiting CEOs of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have received when they were
replaced in September 2008?
Executive compensation is multi-faceted. Compensation is used to attract and retain
employees; it is used to motivate and reward good performance; and it is used to discipline bad
performance. If employees are responsible for both their good and bad decisions, then they
should be compensated according to the successes and failures of those decisions. However,
compensation is a second-best contract since the link between effort and results cannot be
clearly observed and measured. To what extend did the actions or in-activities of the CEO’s of
Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac contribute to the crisis? How could their culpability be measured?
If it can be measured, then the size of their exit package should reflect their degree of culpability
and the extent of their bad performance. However, we have only rough measures of the effort-
performance link and so the exit packages may be perceived by some as too generous and by
others as too severe, based on the perceived strength or weakness of the effort-performance
link.
6. The government bailout of the financial community included taking an equity interest in publicly
traded companies such as American International Group (AIG). Is it right for the government to
become an investor in publicly traded companies?
Arguments can be made both for and against government bailouts. (See the discussion of the
ethics case, Mark-to-Market (M2M) Accounting and the Demise of AIG, in Chapter 8 of the Text.)
Taking an ownership interest means that the government is better able to protect and oversee
its investment in the bailed-out company. This is similar to any other block holder (an investor
that owns ten percent or more of the firm’s stock) that can influence the firm because of its
sizable ownership and investment in the firm.
Business & Professional Ethics for Directors, Executives & Accountants, 9e
Leonard J. Brooks and Paul Dunn,
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller StepsSol. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $29.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
