Exam (elaborations)
WGU C963 - Court Cases - American Politics and the US Constitution Test Bank
- Course
- Institution
WGU C963 - Court Cases - American Politics and the US Constitution Test Bank
[Show more]
Content preview
WGU C963 - CourtCases - American
Politics and the US
Constitution Test
Bank
Denning [Date] [Course title]
, Marbury v. Madison (1803) - Answer: Established judicial review. The courts have the power to strike
down laws that they find to violate the Constitution.
Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) - Answer: The Constitution was not meant to include American citizenship
for black people.
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) - Answer: Separate but equal - Racial segregation laws for public facilities are
Constitutional as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality.
United States v. Miller (1939) - Answer: Upheld The National Firearms Act of 1934 allowing the
government to ban interstate shipping of some unregistered guns unrelated to state militias
Korematsu v. United States (1944) - Answer: Japanese internment is legal holding that the need to
protect against espionage by Japan outweighed the rights of Americans of Japanese descent.
Brown v. Board of Education (1954) - Answer: State laws establishing racial segregation in public schools
were unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality.
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) - Answer: Held that the exclusionary rule, which prevents prosecutors from using
evidence in court that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment, applies to the states.
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) - Answer: In criminal cases, states are required under the Sixth
Amendment to provide an attorney to defendants who are unable to afford their own.
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) - Answer: The court spelled out the right to privacy for the first time in a
case that struck down a state law forbidding married couples from using any form of contraception.
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) - Answer: Detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be
informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections (1966) - Answer: Virginia's poll tax was unconstitutional under the
equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller YourExamplug. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $14.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67232 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now