Exam (elaborations)
CPMSM - Key Credentialing Cases Test questions and answers 2025 latest update
- Course
- Institution
CPMSM - Key Credentialing Cases Test questions and answers 2025 latest update
[Show more]
Content preview
CPMSM - Key CredentialingCases Test questions and
answers 2025 latest update.
Darling v. Charleston Memorial Community Hospital -
answer Failure to have proper supervision; Case set
aside the Charitable Immunity Doctrine.
Hospital liable for negligent treatment resulting in
amputation of teenager's leg nurses failed to monitor;
physician failed to consult; hospital claimed that
charitable immunity doctrine limited damages to its
insurance.
Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital - answer
Negligent credentialing; Failure of initial credentialing
process.
Hospital liable to patient injured by physician who had
failed to disclose pending malpractice cases and lied
about privileges at other hospitals; should have verified
information.
Elam v. College Park Hospital - answer Negligent
Credentialing
, Hospital liable for podiatrist's negligence; failed to obtain
malpractice claims data although medical records
department aware of claims. Podiatrist.
Patrick v. Burget - answer Anti-competitive peer review;
HCQIA; Violation of Federal Anti-trust Laws
Physicians conducted peer review for anti-competitive
reasons liable for violating federal anti-trust laws.
Robinson v. Magovern - answer Hospitals May Determine
Proper Limitation on Competition Within the Hospital and
Surrounding Areas - careful and thorough adherence to
bylaws that contain objective criteria required. Denial of
application is not a restraint of trade.
MD brought antitrust suit because he was denied
privileges. Hospital did this based on shortage of OR
space, unfavorable recommendation, failure to publish MD
on seven other staffs and would probably not be able to
contribute to hospital teaching program.
Miller v. Eisenhower Medical Center - answer Disruptive
Behavior Must be Patient Care Related
Denial of application based on inability to work with
others; no quality of care problems.
Rao v. Auburn General Hospital - answer Disruptive
Behavior. Personality May Be Considered If Affects Ability
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller GUARANTEEDSUCCESS. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $14.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
75759 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now