100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
ENGR-482 Exam 2 Guide With Complete Solution $10.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

ENGR-482 Exam 2 Guide With Complete Solution

 1 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • ENGR-482
  • Institution
  • ENGR-482

ENGR-482 Exam 2 Guide With Complete Solution...

Preview 3 out of 29  pages

  • October 2, 2024
  • 29
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • engr 482 exam 2 guide
  • ENGR-482
  • ENGR-482
avatar-seller
Belina
ENGR-482 Exam 2 Guide With
Complete Solution

People involved in challenger disaster - ANSWER Roger Boisjoly- Enginer at
thiokol

Robert Lund- VP engineer at Thiokol

Jerald Mason- Senior VP at Thiokol who pressured to launch

NASA-Marshall

Rogers commission

decisions of Challenger - ANSWER -Boisjoly voiced concerns anout o-ring
issues

-Thiokol managers responsible for the go/no-go decision initially offered a
no-launch recognition in response to Boisjoly's objections, but reversed this
decision after NASA-marshall administrators reacted negatively

-Despite being told to "put on his management hat" Roger Boisjoly
maintained his view that it was unsafe to launch Challenger in such cold
condition

-Roger Boisjol testified about the questionable process that led up to the
decision to launch Challenger

Technical issues with Challenger - ANSWER -Thiokol engineers in Utah were
beginning to realize that O-ring blowby leakage was adversely affected by
temperature, and that low temp launches could introduce risk that were yet

,not well understood

-The ambient temp at the Florida launch site on the morning of launch was
36 degrees Farenheit, well below previous experiences, and with heavy ice
buildup on the launch vehicle and tower

-hot gases generated by the combustion of solid rocket fuel in the booster
found a pathway through the joint that is sealed by 2 o-rings and filled with
sealing putting

People of Columbia disaster - ANSWER Rodney Rocha- NASA engineer who
had concerns with foam

Linda Ham - NASA senior manager who OK'ed launchColumbia accident
investigation BOARD, admiral HAL Gehman

Decisions in Columbia Disaster - ANSWER -management denied several
requests by different engineering groups for clearer photos of foam impact
on shuttle wing

-although foam strikes were below performance specifications of the shuttle,
management convinced themselves that past successes were an indication
that a known defect would not cause problems, instead of deciding the issue
on the basis of testing and sound engineering analysis

Organizational factors that contributed to the loss of the Columbia: -
ANSWER 1. characterization of the shuttle as an operational, rather than
developmental program

2. schedule pressures

3. organizational barriers preventing effective comm of safety info

, 4. constrained financial and personnel resources

Technical Issues: - ANSWER 1. impact of a briefcase-sized piece of foam that
destroyed the wing leading edge and the main spar in the left wing

2. defects resulting from a non-optimal design, because the bipod structure
and foam application processes were designed separately

3. hot gases entering a breach in the wing leading edge and destroying the
structural integrity of the wing

Groupthink - ANSWER situation in which groups come to agreement at the
expense of critical thinking

1. illusion of invulnerability

2. shared stereotypes

3. rationalizations (shift responsibility to others)

4. illusion of morality

5.self-censorship

6.illusion of unanimit- silence of a group member is consent

7. direct pressure

8. mindguarding- prevening intro of dissening views

Normalization of Deviance - ANSWER acceptance of anomalies or even
increase in the boundaries of acceptable risk, instead of correcting the design
or the operating conditions that led to those anomalies

Proper Engineering Decision - ANSWER A decision that should be made by
engineers or at least governed by professional engineering standards b/c:

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Belina. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77333 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$10.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart