100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
SPMA 2P27 Test 3 - Finance/accounting $10.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

SPMA 2P27 Test 3 - Finance/accounting

 11 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • SPMA 2P27
  • Institution
  • SPMA 2P27

What is the role of athletic in higher education? - Should athletic departments be self-sustaining? - Is this the mandate? - What about other scholastic entities? U.S. Intercollegiate Overview - Approx. 100 member institutions… - Over 30 conferences - Over 460,000 athletes compete - 260+ ...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 19  pages

  • October 4, 2024
  • 19
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • SPMA 2P27
  • SPMA 2P27
avatar-seller
lectkesh
10/4/24, 12:23 AM SPMA 2P27 Test 3 - Finance/accounting




SPMA 2P27 Test 3

Tues, Nov. 7

NCAA/ USports Class

What is the role of athletic in higher education?
- Should athletic departments be self-sustaining?
- Is this the mandate?
- What about other scholastic entities?

U.S. Intercollegiate Overview
- Approx. 100 member institutions…
- Over 30 conferences
- Over 460,000 athletes compete
- 260+ member universities
- focused ‘small athletics programs” NAIA
- In 2015, over 60k athletes
- 23 conferences situated in locations geographically spread across the country
- NJCAA National junior college athletic association- D1,D2,D3
- 2 year college structure
- 525 schools, 221 Div.1
- 24 regions

Consider NCAA v Usports
- pac-12 $3 bill 12 year TV deal
- all power 5 have TV deals that average over $200 million
- Power 5: ACC, Pac 12, Sec Big 10, Big 12
- Individual schools average over $17 million per year from TV contracts

Why do athletic departments still need institutional support (i.e., student fees) to balance their
budgets?
Why only a handful of public FBS programs were deemed self-sustaining?
What about “Pay-to-Play” discussion?
- Most NCAA D1 athletic departments take subsidies

Is accounting accurate?
- Analysis, documentation and adjustment of chargers made between related parties for
goods, services or use of property
- Transfer pricing:
 most athletic programs get charged Market rates for facilities on
- Facility Rental
campus
- Student aid  “List Price” athletic departments pay the full list price on tuition




about:blank 1/19

,10/4/24, 12:23 AM SPMA 2P27 Test 3 - Finance/accounting




- Licensing Who gets the money from licensing?(Allotments and % split) all money
goes back to the university
- Gift assessment  many people do give money specifically to the athletic dept.  Fees
on gifts 5%...6.5%...12% of gifts go to the universities
- AD fees make up 50% of all assesments at many NCAA schools
- Discounted Tickets  Oregon and staff get a 20% discount…students get a 50% discount
on football and basketball with a cap on amount of seats

 Athletic-produced revenues are often attributed to non-athletic accounts (i.e., parking, and
concession sales). This is another example of transfer pricing which reduces the revenue shown
by athletic departments.

In Sum…
- Based on previous studies and accounting for transfer pricing a mere 10% of athletic
departments lose money
**Transfer pricing practices can drastically alter the athletic departments financial picture
Three more considerations
1. AD status
- NPO status
- There is a lack of incentive for athletic departments to maximize profits
- If surpluses are experienced or anticipated, most directors will increase expenditures to
fully utilize their budgets
2. Title IX and policy
- Presents additional complaints
- Oregan law states “ universities will receive lottery proceeds.”
- Athletic departments cannot refuse these funds or relocate them
- NCAA’s requirement that Div. 1 schools sponsor 16 sports…creates a certain “
cost of doing business”
3. Advertising Effect
- 2016-2011.. Out-of-state freshmen increased from 13.5% to 34%
- BSU Out-of-state tuition was $10,400 higher per student (2012).. $8 million more
annually
- 2007 and 2010 Fiesta Bowl appearances.. enrollment increase of 9.1% and 5.6%
respectively
- More selective too. In 2006, over 70% of applicants were admitted vs. only 54% in
2011 quality of students was enhanced

Paying Athletes
- One of the greatest paradoxes of college athletics is wanting athletic departments to be
self-sustaining and wanting greater compensation for student athletes




about:blank 2/19

, 10/4/24, 12:23 AM SPMA 2P27 Test 3 - Finance/accounting




Tues, Nov.14

Key questions from USports
1. Are scholarships sufficient? AFAs- Athletic Financial Award
2. Where are the fans?
3. Why don’t broadcasters carry games?
4. Is this the best development system?
5. Could/ should/ will more USports schools compete in the NCAA?
6. Should U Sports develop a PAC-10/12? What would consequences be?

Canadian Context of Intercollegiate Sport
- Four regional associations (Canada West, OUA, RSEQ, AUS)
- 56+/- member schools
- accommodating 11,000 athletes
CCAA
- Five regional associations
- 94 member associations
- Ten national championships
- Seven sports (ccaa.com)

“No rink on campus”
- At Brock there is no rink on campus… big challenge but not the answer
- USports schools face a revenue challenge each and every year….
- Lots underlying this

Naming rights?
- Alcohol and Canadian schools’ scholarship?
- UofT and Labatt Blue….

“Scholarships” in Canada
- AFAs… “ about” 70% of roster
- Decision came from university presidents votes
- Academic All-Canadians Athletes who achieve an 80% average while being a full time
student and athlete
- Each individual USports team decides how it will divide its AFA’s among its student
athletes Reification
- i.e., you don’t have to max offer
- **Also, it must be noted that schools are not required (or able) to give away all AFA’s
each year (like NCAA minimums)
How do teams pay for AFA’s?
- Largely team driven…. Golf tournaments…




Too long to read on
your phone? Save to


about:blank 3/19

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lectkesh. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62555 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$10.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart