Accounting Theory, Conceptual Issues in a Political and Economic Environment 8e Harry Wolk
l l l l l l l l l l l l
James Dodd John Rozycki (Instructor Manual All Chapters, 100% Original Verified, A
l l l l l l l l l l l l
+Grade) l
Chapter1: An Introduction to Accounting Theory l l l l l l
Instructor’s Manual l
CHAPTER HIGHLIGHTS L
The chapter is concerned with what accounting theory is and where it fits within the “structure” of
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
financial accounting. The definition of accounting theory used in this chapter is broad and
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
complements the objectives of the text. Theory itself helps to explain and predict phenomena that
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
exist in a given field, and this likewise holds true in accounting. In accounting, theory can be
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
developed in response to needs arising from practice, including concepts such as realization and
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
matching. However, as an “infrastructure” has developed in financial accounting, theory is
l l l l l l l l l l l l
formulated in a more institutionalized way by means of the research process.
l l l l l l l l l l l l
Along with political factors and economic conditions, accounting theory contributes to the
l l l l l l l l l l l
standard-setting process. The process of developing standards or making rules is itself largely a
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
deductive process and is certainly concerned with accounting theory.
l l l l l l l l l
The relationship of theory to measurement is very important. While some see measurement as
l l l l l l l l l l l l l
closely related to but separate from theory (as we did in earlier editions), its importance relative to
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
theory is so great that we now consider it to be part of theory. Measurement is the assignment of
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
numbers to the attributes or properties of objects being measured. The different types of
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
measurements and the quality or “goodness” of measurements are examined. The latter embodies
l l l l l l l l l l l l l
(1) the usefulness of the measurement, illustrated here in a predictive context but showing up later in
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
an assessment mode and (2) verifiability or objectivity, which is the degree of consensus among
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
measurers in the statistical sense.
l l l l l
The various valuation models are presented in Appendix 1-A. The models come under the scope of
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
accounting theory. In addition, the different models are mentioned in several theory chapters before
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
being discussed in depth in Chapter 14. Even if there is no desire to go further into inflation
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
accounting in Chapter 14, it is important for students to gain a rudimentary grasp of the concepts
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
involved, as illustrated in Appendix 1-A.
l l l l l l
QUESTIONS
Q-1 What does the term “social reality” mean and why are accounting and accounting theory
l l l l l l l l l l l l l
important examples of it?
l l l l
The term social reality pertains to the measurement of social phenomena and the use of these
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
measurements. The measurements may be representationally faithful (low in bias) and have a high
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
degree of objectivity (verifiability). Or the opposite for either or both of these qualities may be the
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
case. The important thing to grasp, however, is that important consequences stem from the
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
measurement, whether they are “good” or “bad.” For example, an excellent year in terms of income
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
could cause management to be highly rated by shareholders and other interested parties, resulting in
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
high management bonuses, or provide increased dividends to shareholders. All of this could occur
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
even though income is a “construct”: not a “real” factor but a conceptual artifact.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
This example shows why accounting is an important area relative to social reality measurements and
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
constructs. Hopefully, accounting theory can improve the fairness and usefulness of these
l l l l l l l l l l l l
measurements.
l
Accounting Theory(8th edition) l l l Page 1 of 14 l l l
,Chapter1: An Introduction to Accounting Theory
l l l l l l Instructor’s Manual l
Q-2 Why do the value choices (entry value, exit value, and historical cost) fall within the domain of
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
accounting theory?
l l
These are examples of different concepts involved with measuring income which have different
l l l l l l l l l l l l
underlying purposes. These different purposes—which affect social reality—are discussed in the
l l l l l l l l l l l
appendix.
l
Q-3 Of the three inputs to the accounting policy-making function, which do you think is the most
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
important?
l
Of the three inputs (economic conditions, political factors, and accounting theory) to the policy-
l l l l l l l l l l l l l
making function, economic conditions is clearly the most important input. Economic conditions
l l l l l l l l l l l l
can easily influence the accounting theory track as well as the policy-making function. Inflation, for
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
example, in the USA during the 1970s and 80s triggered a significant amount of theoretical work.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
lTheory responded to the actual economic environment. Another prominent example of the
l l l l l l l l l l l
influence economic conditions has is the merger and acquisition wave of the 1960s, which lead to
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
APB Opinion Nos. 16 and 17. Many other standards have also been triggered by economic
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
conditions.
l
Q-4 How can political factors be an input into accounting policy-making if the latter is concerned
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
with governing and making the rules for financial accounting?
l l l l l l l l l
Those who are affected by the rules will usually try to influence what those rules will be. The
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
investment tax credit provides an excellent example. When APB Opinion No. 2 did not allow flow
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
through, lobbying led to APB Opinion No. 4, which did allow immediate recognition in income of
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
investment tax credits. Thestock option battles of the1990’s (and continuing today) is another
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
example of the political process and its effect on rule-making. From a predictive standpoint, we
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
are concerned with how and why political factors play a role in the standard- setting process.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
Q-5 Is accounting theory, as the term is defined in this text, exclusively developed and refined
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
through the research process?
l l l l
Absolutely not. Many concepts such as conservatism and revenue recognition arose on a “common
l l l l l l l l l l l l l
law” type of basis. They were responses to particular problems. Research has, of course, dealt with
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
these issues. Any attempt to leave these concepts outside of the definition of accounting theory
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
would makethe subject matter of accounting theory artificial and incomplete.
l l l l l l l l l l l
Accounting Theory (8th edition) l l l Page 2 of 14 l l l
,Chapter1: An Introduction to Accounting Theory
l l l l l l Instructor’s Manual l
Q-6 What type of measurement is the measurement of objectivity in Equation (1.1): nominal,
l l l l l l l l l l l l
ordinal, interval, or ratio scale?
l l l l l
It is ordinal, due to the squaring effect on each individual deviation from the mean. The zero point,
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
however, is unique. Hence, there would be perfect consensus among measurers. It would mean that
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
each individual measurement would be the same for all measurers.
l l l l l l l l l l
Q-7 The measurement process itself is quite ordinary and routine in virtually all situations.
l l l l l l l l l l l l
Comment on this statement.
l l l l
This is not necessarily the case. Measurements can be extremely complex. For example,
l l l l l l l l l l l l
measuring the temperature of the earth’s atmosphere is extremely difficult. The increasing
l l l l l l l l l l l l
temperature has led both to the hypothesis of the greenhouse effect and to the theorythat the warming
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
global temperatures are simply a fluctuation, a naturally occurring variation.
l l l l l l l l l l
Measuring the success of a man’s life can be perplexing. How does accumulation of Bill Gates’
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
monetary wealth compare with the accomplishments of Ghandi, Nelson Mandela, or Wolfgang
l l l l l l l l l l l l
Amadeus Mozart? What does one actually measure to determine success?
l l l l l l l l l l
Measurements in accounting are significantly less complex, but should not be taken lightly. For l l l l l l l l l l l l l
example, determining the replacement cost or exit value of a firm’s machinery and equipment is not an
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
easy task. Determining net income or earnings during a specified period of time may be more
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
complicated that it appears to be on the surface.
l l l l l l l l l
Q-8 Can assessment measures be used for predictive purposes?
l l l l l l l
Though an assessment measure concerns an attribute or characteristic of an object at the present time,
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
it could be used as a surrogate for a prediction measure if none exists. For example, the best
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
indicator of the current ratio of a firm in a year may be the current ratio today, if budgets have not
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
been prepared.
l l
Q-9 A great deal of interest is generated each week during the college football and college
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
basketball seasons by the ratings of the teams by the Associated Press and United Press
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
International. Sports writers or coaches are polled on what they believe are the top 25 teams
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
in the country. Weightings are assigned (25 points for each first place vote, 24 for each
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
second place vote, . . . one for each 25th place vote) and the results are tabulated. The results
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
appear as a weekly listing of the top 25 teams in the nation. Do you think that these polls
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
illustrate the process of measurement? Discuss.
l l l l l l
An argument can be made that a number is assigned to a team on the basis of a property that might be
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
called the “goodness” or “strength” of a team. However, these measurements do not
l l l l l l l l l l l l l
Accounting Theory (8th edition) l l l Page 3 of 14 l l l
, Chapter1: An Introduction to Accounting Theory l l l l l l Instructor’s Manual l
have a great deal of precision. How good a team is relative to other teams is a property or quality
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
that is extremely intangible compared to other measurements such as median weight of interior
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
linemen, average speed of running backs per 100 meters, etc. Unquestionably, the measurements
l l l l l l l l l l l l l
are indirect.
l l
The qualifications of the measurers are also open to question. Do sportswriters really “know”
l l l l l l l l l l l l l
football? Constraints are also present because the voters mayhave seen very few teams and they may
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
also have regional biases. The numbering scale used is basically ordinal because 1 is considered to
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
be better than 2, which is better than 3. However, the “goodness” of the interval between rankings is
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
not uniform. For example, a voter may feel it is a virtual “toss-up” between 1 and 2, both of which he
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
considers to be vastly superior to 3. As a result, the aggregating process is open to serious question.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
It is also not clear whether the pollsters are making assessment or prediction measures. The
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
measures would be prediction measures if the voter presumes that 1 would beat 2 if they played the
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
following week. We suspect, however, that an assessment measure is being made. The property
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
being assessed is the team’s record to date. Hence, a team with a 6-0-0 record is usually ranked higher
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
than a team with a 5-0-1 record.
l l l l l l l
Q-10 Accounting practitioners have criticized some proposed accounting standards on the l l l l l l l l l
grounds that they would be difficult to implement because of measurement problems. They
l l l l l l l l l l l l l
therefore conclude that the underlying theory is inappropriate. Assuming that the critics are
l l l l l l l l l l l l l
correct about the implementational difficulties, would you agree with their thinking?
l l l l l l l l l l l
Discuss.
l
This question brings together the relationship among theory, policy, and practice. It also brings up
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
Larson’s warning of the necessity to differentiate between theory and measurement even though we
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
believe that Larson’s statement is too strong. Hence, even though the practitioners may be correct
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
about the measurement process recommended by the proposed standard, it does not necessarily
l l l l l l l l l l l l l
mean that the underlying theory is inappropriate. Some theories may indeed lead to dead ends in
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
terms of implementation. More time may also need to be taken to make the measurements
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
operational.
l
Q-11 Some individuals believe that valuation methods proposed by a standard-setting body such
l l l l l l l l l l l
as FASB should be based on those measurement procedures having the highest degree of
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
objectivity as defined by Equation (1.1). Thus, some assets might be valued on the basis of
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
replacement cost and others on net realizable value. Do you see any problems with this
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
proposal? Discuss.
l l
The problem here is basically the opposite of that presented in question 10. In this case, part of the
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
measurement problem might be solved, but at the cost of sacrificing the theoretical base.
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
Hence, the cart is put before the horse, conceptually speaking. However, there are other
l l l l l l l l l l l l l
measurement problems presented by this proposal. It is questionable whether replacement cost
l l l l l l l l l l l l
dollars and net realizable value dollars can be meaningfully added together, even if computed for
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
Accounting Theory (8th edition) l l l Page 4 of 14 l l l