100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Legl2700 Exam 2 Court Cases Questions And Answers $14.99   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. UGA LEGL 2700
  4.  
  5. UGA LEGL 2700

Exam (elaborations)

Legl2700 Exam 2 Court Cases Questions And Answers
 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • UGA LEGL 2700
  • Institution
  • UGA LEGL 2700

Legl2700 Exam 2 Court Cases Questions And Answers New York Times v Sullivan To libel a public officials, there must be "actual malice" because we have more of a right to criticize those in the public eye Curtis Publishing Company v Butts Added public figures to the ruling from New York Time...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

Document information

  • October 19, 2024
  • 4
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • legl2700 exam 2 court cases questions and answers

Written for

  • UGA LEGL 2700
  • UGA LEGL 2700

Seller

avatar-seller
UpperClass

Reviews received

Content preview

Legl2700 Exam 2 Court Cases Questions And
Answers

New York Times v Sullivan To libel a public officials, there must be "actual malice"

because we have more of a right to criticize those in the public eye




Curtis Publishing Company v Butts Added public figures to the ruling from New York

Times v Sullivan; there must be "actual malice" involved




Iannelli v. Burger King Corp. The Iannelli family went to eat at burger king where there

was a group of obnoxious, swearing teenagers. The father asked them to stop and the teens beat

him. The family argued that a commercial enterprise (restaurant) has a duty to exercise

reasonable care towards its patrons. The restaurant does have a duty of reasonable care to those

who are eating in the restaurant, but protecting them from assault does not normally fall within

the duty owed to diners at a restaurant. However, in this case, the family won, because when

warning signs indicate that individuals eating in the restaurant may not be safe, the manager of

the restaurant has a duty to take action to try to prevent injury.




Palgraf v Long Island Railway The railroad was not liable for Palsgraf's injuries because it

was a freak accident and it wasn't reasonably foreseeable

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller UpperClass. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $14.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

82871 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$14.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart