1. Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969, 395 US 444) - ANS-In this case involving the KKK, the
Supreme Court found that only speech or writing that constituted a direct call or plan
to imminent lawless action, an illegal act in the immediate future, could be
suppressed; the mere advocacy of a hypothetical revolution was not enough.
2. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954, 347 US 483) - ANS-This case
challenged the principle of "separate but equal." It was brought by students who were
denied admittance to certain public schools based exclusively on race. The
unanimous decision in this case determined that the existence of racially segregated
public schools violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
3. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores (2014, 573 US) - ANS-This case challenged a
mandate in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that required that all
employment-based group health care plans provide coverage for certain types of
contraceptives. The decision declared that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of
1993 (RFRA) permits for-profit companies to deny coverage for contraception in their
health plans when that coverage violates a religious belief.
4. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) - ANS-A nonprofit corporation
was prevented by the Federal Election Commission (FEC) from showing a movie
about a presidential candidate of the time because it violated the Bipartisan
Campaign Reform Act (BCRA). The decision in this case concluded that the
restrictions imposed by BCRA and enforced by the FEC violated the corporation's
First Amendment right to free expression.
5. Cohen v. California (1971, 403 US 15) - ANS-This case involved an arrest and
conviction for disturbing the peace for wearing a jacket expressing opposition to the
draft (and the Vietnam War). The conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court
since his actions were silent and he made no attempt to otherwise disturb the peace.
6. Dred Scott v. Sandford (1856, 60 US 393) - ANS-Supreme Court declared that slaves
were not citizens of the United States and could not sue in Federal courts. In
addition, this decision declared that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional
and that Congress did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in the territories. Dred
Scott decision was overturned by the 13th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution.
7. Furman v. Georgia (1972, 408 US 238) - ANS-A man was caught burglarizing a
private home. As he fled the scene he tripped causing the gun to accidentally fire,
killing the individual who discovered him. He was convicted of murder and sentenced
to death. In this case the court laid out guidelines for capital punishment.
8. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963, 372 US 335) - ANS-This case perpetuated from the
arrest of a man who was accused of breaking into a poolroom and stealing money
from a cigarette machine. Not being able to afford a lawyer and being denied a public
defender by the judge, the man defended himself and was subsequently found guilty.
Upon his appeal the Supreme Court declared that the Sixth Amendment required that
those facing felony criminal charges be supplied with legal representation.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Qualitydocs. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $12.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.