This is a case brief on Home Pride Foods Of Iowa, Inc. v. Martin. Punitive damages are discussed throughout the case and in this brief with the issue being, "Whether Martin, the consumer, owes Home Pride Foods of Iowa money for the grill. Whether Home Pride Foods of Iowa violated the Truth in Lendi...
Court of Appeals of Iowa. December 24, 2003796 N.W.2d 456 (Table)2003 WL 23005185
Facts:
Lynn Martin bought six months' worth of frozen food for $339.95 each month from a salesman of Home
Pride Foods of Iowa. She was also given a gas grill that she was informed was free, separate from her
food costs even though she needed to sign two contracts. Lynn Martin received a bill for the grill,
$2764.68 plus $833.52 in interest over a thirty-six-month term. She received the gas grill and food and
made two payments on the grill. After the third invoice, Lynn realized that the contract required her to
pay for three years at eighteen percent interest. Unhappy with this realization she asked Home Pride
Foods of Iowa to take the grill back. She did not make any more payments on the grill. Home Pride Foods
of Iowa filed a suit to acquire the remaining balance for the grill. Martin responded with a counterclaim
of fraud and violations of the Truth in Lending Act against Home Pride Foods of Iowa.
Issue:
Whether Martin, the consumer, owes Home Pride Foods of Iowa money for the grill.
Whether Home Pride Foods of Iowa violated the Truth in Lending Act and committed fraud for
misrepresenting the conditions of ownership of the grill.
.
Holding:
All elements of fraud were proven. However, no actual damages have been awarded to Lynn Martin. The
jury awarded Lynn Martin $82,228.20 in punitive damages and the district court awarded her $42,368.71
in attorney fees. Home Pride had a $3,334.08 penalty pursuant to the Truth in Lending Act. The court
held that Home Pride Foods of Iowa misrepresented the price or lack thereof of their grill and punitive
damages awarded to the defendant, Martin were proper. This misrepresentation violated the company’s
due process rights.
Conclusion: Home Pride Foods of Iowa appeals on the grounds that the amount in punitive damages
should not have been awarded on the grounds that it violates the company’s rights. Home Pride Foods
also claims the court abused its responsibility when it admitted certain testimony, awarded attorney
fees, and calculated the statutory penalty for the Truth in Lending violations. This case is currently in
appeal.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller racheldebner. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.