100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
CJ 485 Exam 3 UPDATED ACTUAL Questions and CORRECT Answers $11.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

CJ 485 Exam 3 UPDATED ACTUAL Questions and CORRECT Answers

 1 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • CJ 485
  • Institution
  • CJ 485

CJ 485 Exam 3 UPDATED ACTUAL Questions and CORRECT Answers United States v. Leon - CORRECT ANSWER- Illegally obtained evidence may be used in a trial if it was gathered in good faith without violating the principles of the Mapp decision United States v. Leon Good Faith Exception to the Excl...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 11  pages

  • October 30, 2024
  • 11
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • CJ 485
  • CJ 485
avatar-seller
MGRADES
CJ 485 Exam 3 UPDATED ACTUAL
Questions and CORRECT Answers
United States v. Leon - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔- Illegally obtained evidence may be used
in a trial if it was gathered in good faith without violating the principles of the Mapp decision


United States v. Leon


Good Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔- Evidence
obtained by an INVALID warrant, lacking probable cause, may still be admitted IF:


1. Police had objective good faith reliance
2. On a search warrant (or it's computer representation)
3. Issued by a detached and neutral magistrate
a.) independent of law enforcement, and
b.) capable of determining
4. AND executed within the scope of the warrant's terms.


Franks v. Delaware (1978) - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔- Where a warrant affidavit contains a
statement, necessary to the finding of probable cause, that is demonstrated to be both false
and included by an affiant knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the
truth, the warrant is not valid.


Franks v. Delaware Test


Motion to Traverse - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔- 1. To even get a hearing:
A) Defendant must make a "substantial preliminary showing" that "specific portions" of the
affidavit contain:
1) Deliberate Falsehoods (LIES) or
2) Statements made in "reckless disregard of the truth".


AND

, B) The deliberate falsehoods/reckless statements must be "material to probable cause", so if
deleted affidavit would not support probable cause.


Arizona v. Evans (1995) - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔- Exclusionary Rule Exceptions:
computer errors exception.


Arizona v. Evans (1995) - Clerical Errors - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔- - guy pulled
over/license plate showed that guy had arrest warrant/guy steps out of car and joint falls
out/found more drugs in car (probable cause)
- they find out the warrant for his arrest wasn't real (clerk made mistake)
- quashed warrant: should have been revoked, computer had the wrong information, he
actually had paid his last ticket
- keep the evidence because police thought the warrant was real and this is extending good
faith


Knock and Announce Rule - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔- The requirement that the police
knock at the door and announce their identity, authority, and purpose before entering a
residence to execute an arrest or search warrant.


Knock & Announce DEPTH Pt. 1


Reasonableness in Execution of Warrants - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔- 1. Wilson v. Arkansas
(1995)
The Common Law rule that police officers must first knock and announce their presence
BEFORE ENTRY is now part of the 4A reasonableness.


2. Richards v. Wisconsin (1997)
A) there is NO 'PER SE' or absolute exception to the knock and announce requirement for
executing search warrants on drug dealers' homes.


B) Police CAN forgo Knock & Announce when they have reasonable suspicion of:
1.) Threat of Physical Violence.
2.) Destruction of Evidence

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MGRADES. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $11.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81989 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$11.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart