Summary

Summary Engineering physics

0 purchase

Course
PH1101

Institution
Ragiv Gandhi University Of Knowledge Technologies

Title: Electrodynamics - Comprehensive Notes & Study Guide Description: This Electrodynamics document provides a clear, organized, and detailed study guide perfect for students of electrical engineering or physics. Covering fundamental topics from Coulomb's Law to Maxwell's Equations, it include...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 28 pages

View example

Uploaded on November 9, 2024
Number of pages 28
Written in 2024/2025
Type Summary

engineering physics
physics
b tech
b tech physics
1 st year
2nd year
electro dynamics

Institution
Ragiv Gandhi University of knowledge technologies
Course
PH1101

$7.88

Add to cart

Save

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

M.No. 2.1

Maxwell’s Equations

Electrodynamics before Maxwell

So far, we have encountered the following laws, specifying the divergence and curl
of electric and magnetic fields:

1
(i)   E  ρ (Gauss’s law for electricity),
ε0

(ii)   B  0 (Gauss’s law for magnetism),

B
(iii)   E   (Faraday’s law)
t

(iv)   B  µ 0 J (Ampere’s law)

These equations represent the state of electromagnetic theory over a century ago,
when Maxwell began his work. They were not written in so compact a form in those
days, but their physical content was familiar. Now, it happens there is a fatal
inconsistency in these formulas. It has to do with the old rule that divergence of curl
is always zero. If you apply the divergence to number (iii), everything works out:

 B  
    E           B 
 t  t

The left side is zero because divergence of curl is zero; the right side is zero by
virtue of equation (ii). But when you do the same thing to number (iv), you get into
trouble:

     B   µ 0    J  ------------ (1)

the left side must be zero, but the right side, in general, is not. For steady currents,
the divergence of J is zero, but evidently when we go beyond magneto statics

,Ampere’s law cannot be right. There’s another way to see that Ampere’s law is
bound to fail for nonsteady currents. Suppose we’re in the process of charging up a
capacitor (Fig. 1). In integral form, Ampere’s law reads

 B  dl  µ 0Ienc
In this case, the simplest surface lies in the plane of the loop - the wire punctures
this surface, so Ienc = I. Fine-but what if we draw instead the balloon-shaped
surface in Fig. 1? No current passes through this surface, and we conclude that Ienc
= 0! We never had this problem in magnetostatics because the conflict arises only
when charge is piling up somewhere (in this case, on the capacitor plates). But for
nonsteady currents (such as this one) “the current enclosed by a loop” is an ill-
defined notion, since it depends entirely on what surface we use. Remember that
the Amperian loop could be some contorted shape that doesn’t even lie in a plane.

Of course, we had no right to expect Ampere’s law to hold outside of
magnetostatics; after all, we derived it from the Biot-Savart law. However, in
Maxwell’s time there was no experimental reason to doubt that Ampere’s law was
of wider validity. The flaw was a purely theoretical one, and Maxwell fixed it by
purely theoretical arguments.

, How Maxwell Fixed Ampere’s Law

The problem is on the right side of Eq. (1) which should be zero, but isn’t. Applying
ρ
the continuity equation   J   and Gauss’s law, the offending term can be
t
rewritten:

ρ   E 
J      ε 0  E      ε 0 
t t  t 

It might occur to you that if we were to combine ε 0 (E / t ) with J, in Ampere’s law, it
would be just right to kill off the extra divergence:

E
 B  μ 0J  μ 0 ε 0 ---------- (2)
t

Such a modification changes nothing, as far as magnetostatics is concerned: when
E is constant, we still have ∇ x B = µ0J. In fact, Maxwell’s term is hard to detect in
ordinary electromagnetic experiments, where it must compete for recognition with
J; that’s why Faraday and the others never discovered it in the laboratory.
However, it plays a crucial role in the propagation of electromagnetic waves. Apart
from curing the defect in Ampere’s law, Maxwell’s term has a certain aesthetic
appeal: Just as a changing magnetic field induced an electric field (Faraday’s law),
so A changing electric field induces a magnetic field.

Of course, theoretical convenience and aesthetic consistency are only suggestive-
there might, after all, be other ways to doctor up Ampere’s law. The real
confirmation of Maxwell’s theory came in 1888 with Hertz’s experiments on
electromagnetic waves. Maxwell called his extra term the displacement current
density.

E
Jd  ε0 --------- (3)
t

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.