100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
QME EXAM NEWEST 2024 ACTUAL EXAM COMPLETE 370 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS (VERIFIED ANSWERS) $25.89   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

QME EXAM NEWEST 2024 ACTUAL EXAM COMPLETE 370 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS (VERIFIED ANSWERS)

 8 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • QME
  • Institution
  • QME

QME EXAM NEWEST 2024 ACTUAL EXAM COMPLETE 370 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS (VERIFIED ANSWERS) QME EXAM NEWEST 2024 ACTUAL EXAM COMPLETE 370 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS (VERIFIED ANSWERS) QME EXAM NEWEST 2024 ACTUAL EXAM COMPLETE 370 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED A...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 161  pages

  • November 10, 2024
  • 161
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • QME
  • QME
avatar-seller
nyagajoseph539
QME EXAM NEWEST 2024 ACTUAL EXAM COMPLETE 370
QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS
(VERIFIED ANSWERS)




QME - ANSWER-Qualified Medical Examiner


permanent and stationary - ANSWER-When a condition reaches a
state of maximal medical improvement.


Escobedo case - ANSWER--Set standard of reasonable medical
probability (standard a physician is expected to
follow, that based on superior evidence,
something is probably/more likely than not)
-These words turn the report
into substantial evidence


Rolda issues/Limits on compensability of psych issues - ANSWER-
1. Did psych injury involve "actual events of
employment"? (IW has
burden of proof)
2. Is there >50% industrial
causation (IW burden)
3. Was there personnel action and was it lawful, non-
discriminatory, and in good faith? (Defense burden)

,4. Were personnel actions the substantial (>35-40%) cause
of the psych injury. (defense burden)


Granado case - ANSWER--Set standard that medical tx (MT) is not
apportionable


Benson case - ANSWER--Clarified parsing out
impairment to different injury dates
-If they can't be parceled out, you can say they
are "inextricably intertwined."


Guzman case/Almaraz-Guzman standard - ANSWER--Alternative
rating of disability (when case is complex/extraordinary and AMA
good doesn't accurately reflect the persons impairment)
-WPI rating can be made if it's accurate and based on AMA guides
(fairness is not allowed anymore)


Blackledge v BofA - ANSWER-
WCAB defined roles for:
-
physician
-DEU
rater
-parties

,-Work comp
judge


Blackledge case: physician requirements - ANSWER-1. Compare
medical findings
2. List WPI for each med condition
3. Select impairment in the range based on impact on ADLs
4. ADL analogies
-Role of evaluator is to assess WPI % by a report that sets forth facts
and reasoning to support conclusions and are in line with AMA &
case law


Alternative rating under Almaraz/Guzman - ANSWER-1. Begin w
strict rating found in the chapter address the
injured
body part
2. Explain what specific facts
require an alternative rating
3. Provide analysis as to why
alternative rating is more accurate
4. Set forth how Dr
arrived at alt rating
5. State position with
reasonable medical probability

, Original intent of WC - ANSWER--Provide minimum level of benefits
promptly
-To prevent IW from becoming a burden on others and
help IW return to work thru rehab -Help dependents if
IW dies
-MT for job related
injuries/illness
-TD benefits for
lost wages
-PD benefits for finished ability to
compete in open labor market


Boyton act - ANSWER--1913: required most employers to have WC
coverage
-Later expanded to include provision that when rating disability,
persons diminished ability to compete in open job market should be
considered


Historic compromise - ANSWER--Trade-off of rights and benefits
-Employee gives up right to sue for lots of $ and gets
protection from legal system against discrimination -
Employer provides benefits regardless of fault in exchange
for protection from lawsuits -3 components
1. No fault
2. Exclusive remedy

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller nyagajoseph539. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $25.89. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$25.89
  • (0)
  Add to cart