An in-depth discursive essay of Richard III that achieved full marks (15/15) that will show you the structure you need to succeed in Part A of the Shakespeare question in the 'Drama and Poetry pre-1900' paper. It contains arguments both in agreement with the given statement and countering the state...
“Richard’s ascent to the throne is made easier by the foolishness and innocence of those who stand in this way."
“Richard’s attitude towards women is the result of his own insecurities."
"From the extracts that you have read, assess the extent to which Richard, Iago and Edmund share the same characteristics."
All for this textbook (8)
Written for
A/AS Level
OCR
English Language and Literature
Unit 1
All documents for this subject (59)
1
review
By: vkondou • 3 year ago
By: svhboyes • 3 year ago
Please may I ask why this is only 1/5? It is an essay marked 15/15 at A level standard for OCR’s exam board
Seller
Follow
svhboyes
Reviews received
Content preview
S. V. H. Boyes
Section 1 - Shakespeare, Richard III
Discuss the following passage from Act 3 Scene 7, exploring Shakespeare’s use of language
and dramatic effects. [15]
This extract illustrates Buckingham’s intelligence and the weakness of support for Richard’s bid for
the throne as the importance of appealing to a power-base of influential citizens is explored.
Buckingham’s tone becomes increasingly apprehensive as Richard’s responses become more
desperate and urgent, indicating his outrage. As a result, the power balance between the two men is
momentarily subverted as Richard must comply with his kingmaker’s suggestions in order to
strengthen his position with the citizens.
Shakespeare illustrates Buckingham’s intelligence by constructing several subtle references to
familial relationships and bastardy through use of word choice. The use of “holy mother” followed by
the description of the citizens as “mum” subconsciously resonates with the theme of bastardy,
suggesting a pun on the adjective “mum”, although this would be more pertinent to modern
audiences than those of Shakespeare’s era. Shakespeare alludes to the rumour of Edward IV’s
sexual promiscuity more obviously in lines 7-9; however, less noticeable references are made to this
trait through the use of “laid open” and “untouch’d, or slightly handled”. Although these phrases are
not used in reference to illegitimacy, they could subconsciously be linked to the theme of unchaste
behaviour which is hinted at by the choice of phrases which could be used in reference to women -
“laid open”, for example, suggests undressing.
A metrical stress on the verb “got” in line 10 results in a break in the sentence, emphasising the fact
that the Duke of York and his wife were apart when Edward IV was conceived. The harshness of the
‘T’ sound is jarring compared to the rest of the line, suggesting that bastardy is jarring within nature
too, as the child was seen to harbour sin. Equally, the physical distance that is alluded to further
emphasises Edward’s “resemblance, being not like the duke”, because their features are supposedly
unalike, thus there is ‘distance’ in their genetics too. It is interesting to note that Shakespeare grasps
upon features as a reason to infer bastardy when one accounts for Richard’s own deformity being
striking compared to the rest of his family, even more so as he is the only disabled character we
encounter. The irony is that Richard’s only semblance to his father could be facial, unlike his
nephews who could fulfil the description of being “the right idea of your father, / Both in your form
and nobleness of mind”.
The weakness of Richard’s position is indicated by him being dictated instructions by Buckingham in
lines 45-48. The use of “look” and “play” within Buckingham’s speech make clear the intentions of
fooling the citizens via Richard’s accomplishment in acting. The power balance between the two
characters shifts, rather quickly, as Richard immediately agrees: “I go”. This could, on the other
hand, be undermined by what follows:
“...if you plead as well for them
As I can say nay to thee for myself”.
This speech is ironic in that it foreshadows Richard’s denial of Buckingham’s request in Act 4,
although Buckingham is unaware of this, which may suggest Richard never intended to deliver
Buckingham his reward. Imbalance of power between Richard and the citizens is also physically
demonstrated by his being on “the leads” during the next scene - his superiority is shown through
his closeness to Heaven; the irony at play is that Richard is the most morally corrupt character in the
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller svhboyes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.87. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
