100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Constitutional Law |50 Multiple Choice Questions With Answers|15 Pages $8.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Constitutional Law |50 Multiple Choice Questions With Answers|15 Pages

 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Constitutional Law
  • Institution
  • Constitutional Law

Which of the following are the two major factors the Court uses in determining if a certain issue is a non-justiciable political question? - ️️(1) The textual constitutional commitment of the issue to a political branch (2) The lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards. Which o...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 15  pages

  • November 16, 2024
  • 15
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • Constitutional Law
  • Constitutional Law
avatar-seller
jackline98
Which of the following are the two major factors the Court uses in
determining if a certain issue is a non-justiciable political question? -
✔ ✔ (1) The textual constitutional commitment of the issue to a
political branch
(2) The lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards.
Which of the following best describes how the concept of a state's
"quasi-sovereign interests" modifies the standing analysis in the view of
the Court in Massachusetts v. EPA? - ✔ ✔ A state can satisfy the
injury-in-fact requirements by showing evidence of harms - such as
harms to the state's quasi-sovereign interest in protecting its air or
water quality - even though such harms would likely not be
particularized enough to let an individual citizen satisfy the injury-in-
fact requirement on the grounds that citizen is hurt by polluted air.
Which of the following best describes how the presence of a foreign
affairs issue will affect the Court's application of the political question
doctrine? - ✔ ✔ If the issue concerns foreign affairs, the Court will
be more likely to view it as a non-justiciable political question because
such issues are frequently reserved by the Constitution for the
Executive or the Legislature, often require policy-based judgment calls
not easily subject to judicial principles, and often require decisive and
unified action.
Which of the following best explains how the court applies the
requirement that there be no "independent constitutional bar" to a
funding condition which the federal government attaches to the funds
it offers to a state? - ✔ ✔ The funding condition may not induce the

, states to take actions that would violate the US Constitution, such as
violating individuals' First Amendment rights.
Which of the following best explains why commandeering would
undermine political accountability according to Justice O'Connor and
Justice Scalia (in their NY v. US and Printz v. US decisions)? - ✔ ✔
Because although the federal government is the one imposing the
policy, citizens would see state governments enacting it legislatively or
state officials carrying it out, and thus may blame the state for what the
federal government has required.
1. Congress passes a law that is not clearly within the power expressly
granted to it by the Constitution: it passes a law requiring individuals
to purchase health insurance and it grants that passing such a law is
not among the powers expressly given to it by Article I, Section 8.
However, it argues, doing so it constitutional because such a health
insurance mandate is a necessary and proper measure for Congress to
effectively regulate interstate commerce (and more specifically, the
national market in health insurance).
Which of the following summarizes the "aggregation principle" in
Commerce Clause jurisprudence? - ✔ ✔ Even if a single instance of
a particular kind of economic activity would not have a substantial
effect in interstate commerce if the aggregation of different instances
of that activity would have substantial effect on interstate commerce,
Congress has owe to regulate it.
Why, according to Justice Scalia's argument in his Raich concurring
opinion, does the federal government have power under the Commerce
Clause and necessary and proper clause to criminalize even simple
possession of marijuana? - ✔ ✔ Because Congress undoubtedly has
the power to regulate interstate trafficking of marijuana and regulating
of simple possession (even though it is non-economic activity) is a
necessary part of that larger federal regulatory scheme.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jackline98. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$8.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart