100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary SOC 200 - Case Study Report 1: THREE JAYS CORPORATION; Complete solution. $8.39   Add to cart

Summary

Summary SOC 200 - Case Study Report 1: THREE JAYS CORPORATION; Complete solution.

7 reviews
 3808 views  50 purchases

Case Study Report 1: THREE JAYS CORPORATION 1. Using the data in case Exhibit 4 and the 2012 annual demand, calculate the EOQ and ROP quantities for the five SKUs scheduled to be produced in the last week of June. How do these amounts compare with those calculated in 2011? Compare the increases i...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 12  pages

  • March 7, 2020
  • 12
  • 2024/2025
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (29)

7  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: 603223241 • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: naibbgirard • 3 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: awaislakkhani • 3 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: jsabatini • 4 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: jd123 • 4 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: jintong777777 • 4 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: perseusbalite • 4 year ago

avatar-seller
dennys
Case Study 1 – Three Jays Corporation 831512392



Case Study Report 1: THREE JAYS CORPORATION



1. Using the data in case Exhibit 4 and the 2012 annual demand, calculate the EOQ and ROP
quantities for the five SKUs scheduled to be produced in the last week of June. How do these
amounts compare with those calculated in 2011? Compare the increases in EOQs with the increases
in annual demand. (2.5 points)


The 2012 Annual Demand is given as


Exhibit 5: Monthly Sales Data
Fe Year
Label Type
Jan b Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total
3Js Strawberry Jam
2012 345 301 325 299 344 296 329 334 349 325 289 333 3,869
2013 566 671 384 631 616 2,868
Marran
Raspberry Jelly
Markets
2012 229 270 236 279 273 255 236 232 235 276 244 241 3,006
2013 744 737 425 379 571 2,856
Kerry's Marts Peach Jam
2012 156 176 174 144 160 178 155 159 178 166 176 148 1,970
2013 167 146 78 84 117 592
Dom's Food
Blueberry Jam
Stores
2012 92 109 98 99 102 111 103 99 94 104 107 93 1,211
2013 100 99 80 139 108 526
AAA Grocers Apple/Mint Jelly
2012 66 77 79 69 65 66 68 67 62 74 71 68 832
2013 73 63 110 146 88 480

The EOQ and ROP quantities for the five SKU’s based on 2012 annual demand is given as


Total Annual Carryin Unit EOQ ROP
Set up Deman g Cost Cost (C) (cases) (cases)
cost (S) d (D) (i) %
Strawberry Jam 63.7 3869 9% 28.34 440 223
Raspberry Jam 63.7 3006 9% 30.52 373 173

Page 1 of 12

, Case Study 1 – Three Jays Corporation 831512392


Peach Jam 63.7 1970 9% 26.86 322 114
Blueberry Jam 63.7 1211 9% 29.01 243 70
Apple/Mint Jelly 63.7 832 9% 26.32 212 48




As Demand increased from 2011 to 2012, the EOQ’s also increased


Deman Deman Increase EOQ EOQ Increase
d (2010) d (2012) in (2010) (2012) in EOQ
Demand
2993 3869 29.27% 387 440 13.70%
2335 3006 28.74% 329 373 13.37%
1492 1970 32.04% 280 322 15.00%
886 1211 36.68% 208 243 16.83%
625 832 33.12% 183 212 15.85%

So, if Annual Demand doubles, the EOQ will increase by sqrt(2)


2. Brodie is uncertain if the costs presented in case Exhibit 2 are appropriate for determining the
EOQs. What changes would you recommend, and why? Should the cost of the three idle part-time
workers be included when the production line is down? Using the 2012 annual demand, and your
recommendations, recalculate the EOQs for the five SKUs. (2.5 points)


In set up costs, the cost of part time workers should also be included, as they are idle at that time.

Assuming the salary of each part time worker to be half that of full time worker

So, Total salary of 3 part time workers, during idle time of 1 hour = 3*0.5*23.5 = $35.25

So, new set up cost = $63.7 + $35.25 = $98.95

In carrying cost, storage cost was considered as 0%, which should be more because, there is always an
opportunity cost of storing one inventory over another.

So, considering storage cost as 2%, new carrying cost = 6% + 2% + 3% = 11%

Some of the basic assumptions of EOQ are debated

• The demand is not uniform throughout the year, which may lead to stock outs

• The order of new batch takes time and is not done instantly. For this case, the ROP should be adjusted
to include the lead time to place order

Page 2 of 12

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller dennys. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.39. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62890 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$8.39  50x  sold
  • (7)
  Add to cart