100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
AIC 301 - Final Exam Prep Questions And Answers Updated 2024/2025 $11.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

AIC 301 - Final Exam Prep Questions And Answers Updated 2024/2025

 3 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • AIC 301
  • Institution
  • AIC 301

©THESTAR EXAM SOLUTIONS 2024/2025 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 1 | P a g e AIC 301 - Final Exam Prep Questions And Answers Updated 2024/2025 The act of leaving a dangerous article such as a gun or car with a person who the lender knows, or should know, is likely to use it in an unreasonably risky ma...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 17  pages

  • November 24, 2024
  • 17
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • AIC 301
  • AIC 301
avatar-seller
TheStar
©THESTAR EXAM SOLUTIONS 2024/2025

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.



AIC 301 - Final Exam Prep Questions And
Answers Updated 2024/2025

The act of leaving a dangerous article such as a gun or car with a person who the lender knows,
or should know, is likely to use it in an unreasonably risky manner is known as
Select one:
A. Negligent entrustment.
B. Contributory negligence.
C. Negligent supervision.

D. The dangerous instrumentality doctrine. - answer✔A. Negligent entrustment.
There was a large unmarked sinkhole on Charlotte's property, a short distance from a public
road. One evening, a police officer chased a mugger off the road and onto Charlotte's property.
Both the officer and the mugger fell into the hole and were injured. Which one of the following
best answers whether Charlotte is liable for the injuries to the police officer and/or to the
mugger?
Select one:
A. Charlotte is not liable to either the officer or the mugger, because occupiers of land have no
duty to correct defects abutting sidewalks or streets.
B. Charlotte is liable to both the officer and the mugger, because she had a duty to avoid
endangering travelers with an unguarded ditch.
C. Charlotte is not liable to the officer or the mugger, because they were both trespassers on
her property.
D. Charlotte is liable to the officer for the unguarded ditch, because the officer was a licensee,
but she is not liable to the tres - answer✔D. Charlotte is liable to the officer for the unguarded
ditch, because the officer was a licensee, but she is not liable to the trespassing mugger.
Antonia was a life tenant who occupied a house at 33 Main Street. Emil had a remainder
interest in the property and planned to occupy it after Antonia's death. Antonia obtained


1|Page

, ©THESTAR EXAM SOLUTIONS 2024/2025

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
property insurance covering the house, through Richley Insurance Co. The house was destroyed
by fire during Antonia's life estate. Richley must pay the insurance policy proceeds to
Select one:
A. Emil, under the doctrine of equitable conversion.
B. Antonia, since she occupied the house at the time of the fire.
C. Antonia, because life tenants can recover the entire value of the property that they insure.

D. Emil, because he will ultimately own the property. - answer✔C. Antonia, because life tenants
can recover the entire value of the property that they insure.
Cristobal is in the process of purchasing a home from Leah. They are in the executory period.
This means that
Select one:
A. Cristobal and Leah have signed the real estate sales contract, but have not yet closed.
B. Cristobal has made an offer and Leah has accepted verbally.
C. Cristobal and Leah have signed the real estate sales contract and have gone to closing.

D. Cristobal has made a verbal offer, which Leah is considering. - answer✔A. Cristobal and Leah
have signed the real estate sales contract, but have not yet closed.
Kirk contracts with Ernest for five shipments of fresh produce at a specific price per shipment
due at the time of delivery. Kirk fails to ship the third shipment. The contract between Kirk and
Ernest is
Select one:
A. Void.
B. Unilateral.
C. Divisible.

D. Entire. - answer✔C. Divisible. A contract is divisible if each party's performance can be
divided into two or more parts and if it appears that the parties to the contract contemplated
separate compensation for each installment of the performance. Failure to perform one
installment is not failure to perform the entire agreement. If the contract is divided into parts
only to provide periodic payments toward the full amount due upon contract completion, the
contract is an entire contract, not a divisible one. When possible, courts prefer to interpret
contracts as divisible to avoid hardships that can result from delaying payments under the
contract until full performance has been completed.
2|Page

, ©THESTAR EXAM SOLUTIONS 2024/2025

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Fatima owns a cafe that is open to the public. Kaito enters the cafe and orders a coffee. Kaito is
a(n)
Select one:
A. Public invitee.
B. Business invitee.
C. Express licensee.

D. Trespasser. - answer✔B. Business invitee.
James wants to pursue a legal claim against his neighbor, but he does not know what kind of
dispute resolution procedure is the best choice for his situation. The dispute is over a relatively
small amount of money, so James does not want to spend a lot in pursuit of his claim. James
wants to be able to present his side of the story and his witnesses before a neutral third party.
James would be pleased if he and his neighbor could reach a compromise, but, ideally, James
wants to be able to walk away with a binding decision. Assuming that James' neighbor will
agree to participate in whatever procedure James suggests, which one of the following dispute
resolution procedures is the best choice for James?
Select one:
A. Mediation
B. Negotiation
C. Arbitration

D. Litigation - answer✔C. Arbitration
Chloe is investigating Thomas' claim for damage to his automobile. Thomas is not cooperating
with Chloe's attempts to schedule an adjuster to inspect the vehicle. Chloe should
Select one:
A. Issue a unilateral waiver of rights letter.
B. Issue a unilateral reservation of rights letter.
C. Issue denial for failure to cooperate.

D. Ask Thomas to sign a reservation of rights letter. - answer✔B. Issue a unilateral reservation
of rights letter.




3|Page

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller TheStar. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $11.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62890 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$11.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart