Summary

Summary Development of Pro- and Antisocial Behaviour

4 purchases

Course
Development of Pro- and Antisocial Behaviour (SOWPSB2SP7)

Institution
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (RU)

2020! Exam-ready. Everything you need for the exam of Development of Pro- and Antisocial Behaviour (2020). A course at the Radboud University, Psychology. All relevant information from the lectures and Powerpoints, supplemented with additional information from the literature and from the internet.

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 60 pages

View example

Uploaded on March 19, 2020
Number of pages 60
Written in 2019/2020
Type Summary

sow psb2sp70n
radboud university
radboud universiteit
psychology
development of pro and antisocial behaviour
pro and antisocial behaviour
pro and antisocial behavior
pro and anti social behavior
ps

Institution
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (RU)
Education
Bachelor Psychologie
Course
Development of Pro- and Antisocial Behaviour (SOWPSB2SP7)

elinemeuleman

Member since 7 year 812 documents sold

$4.31

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Pro- and antisocial behavior
Lecture 1: Definitions and main theories of prosocial behaviour
Why examine prosocial behavior?
 Important theme in religion, philosophy, folktales,…
o Universal
o Adaptive function (evolutionary psychology)
1900: scientists (Mc Dougall) show interest in prosocial behavior, but interest readily
declines. He said it’s an instinct and therefore some people are more pro-social than others.
But it was also considered as racism, because he said some people are inferior. In the same
time, behavioural psychology was very popular (manipulating within experiments).

Turning point in the ‘60s: Murder of Kitty Genovese
In the early hours of March 13, 1964, 28-year-old Kitty Genovese was stabbed outside the apartment
building across the street from where she lived in an apartment above a row of shops on Austin
Street in Kew Gardens, Queens, a borough of New York City. Two weeks after the murder, The New
York Times published an article claiming that 38 witnesses saw or heard the attack, but none of them
called the police or came to her aid.

The incident prompted inquiries into what became known as the bystander effect or "Genovese
syndrome", and the murder became a staple of American psychology textbooks for the next four
decades. However, researchers have since uncovered major inaccuracies in the New York Times
article.

What is prosocial behavior?
Prosocial behavior: Behavior that is deﬁned by society as generally beneﬁcial to other people and/or
to the ongoing political or cultural system

NOTE:
 Always interpersonal  There’s always a person helping one (or more) other people
 Context dependent  In a certain society something is pro-social, context is also the time

Speciﬁc forms of prosocial behavior are:
1. Helping
2. Altruism
3. Cooperation

1. Helping
= Any action that has the consequence of providing some beneﬁt to or improving the well-being of
another person.

Four sorts of helping:
 Casual help, e.g., giving directions
 Substantial help, e.g., lending money
 Emotional help, e.g., listening
 Emergency help, e.g., saving someone, helping in crisis

McGuire described four different types of helping behavior. Casual helping involves doing small
favors for casual acquaintances, such as letting someone borrow your cell phone for a quick call. If
you have ever helped a friend or family member to move, you’ve engaged in substantial personal
helping. This helping involves putting out a lot of effort to help someone over an extended time, so
that the recipient can have a beneﬁt. Emotional helping means providing care and personalized

,emotional support to another, like listening to a friend who has had a bad day or giving knowledge
and advice to someone who requests it. Finally, emergency helping is assisting someone who has an
acute problem. This would be like calling 911 when you witness a car accident. A concept related to
McGuire’s classiﬁcations of helping behavior is social support, which can involve providing both
resources to help a person solve a problem and the emotional or psychological support required to
endure the stresses of life’s problems.

3 dimensional classification system (Pearce & Amato, 1980):

 Seriousness: less severe/more severe
 Formal (planned) vs informal: helping in car accident is spontaneous
 Indirect/direct: indirect is e.g. calling the police, direct is dragging someone out of the car.

P.L. Pearce and P. R. Amato classiﬁed the kinds of helping as falling along three dimensions: level of
planning and formality, directness of the help, and seriousness of the need. Level of planning and
formality can range from very formal and planned, like working as a hospital volunteer each week, to
very spontaneous and informal, like helping someone who has dropped some papers in the hallway.
Directness of help refers to level of contact with the recipient of help from very direct, like helping a
young girl tie her shoes, to very indirect, like mailing off a charity donation to help hurricane victims.
Finally, the seriousness of the need should be taken into account. There is a big difference in lending
someone a few pennies when he or she is short at the grocery store and doing CPR and rescue
breathing on someone who has had a heart attack. The consequences of the former are very small,
whereas the consequences of the latter could mean the difference between life and death.

2. Altruism
= Helping purely out of the desire to beneﬁt someone else, with no beneﬁt (and often a cost) to
oneself
 Helping can be either altruistic or for egoistic reasons.

3. Cooperation
= Acting together (in a coordinated way) in the pursuit of shared goals, the enjoyment of the joint
activity, or simply furthering the relationship. E.g. serious request, ice bucket challenge.

,When are people prosocial?
Latané and Darley Model:
Whether a person will act prosocially (or not) is the result of a logical decision-making process that
includes 5 steps.

1. Notice the event  The clarity and context of the event as well as the mood of the helper
determines whether someone notices something is wrong.
o Noticing is less likely when walking through the busy city.
o Noticing is less likely when you are sad, because someone is more introvert.
2. Interpret event as emergency  Clear signs of distress increase the chance of bystanders
interpreting the situation as an emergency.
3. Taking personal
o Bystander effect: When you are the only person witnessing an emergency, you are
more likely to help than when there are more witnesses
o Inverse relationship: the greater the number of bystanders, the less likely anyone will
help
o Why?
 Pluralistic ignorance: looking to one another to (re)interpret situation (Step
2. Interpret the event)
 Diffusion of responsibility: believing that someone else will take
responsibility
4. Know what to do  Limited research
5. Implement decision  Limited research

Shotland & Heinold (1985)  Are people with a ﬁrst aid training better able to decide what to do?
And do they take action?
 They do not help more often
 They do provide better quality of help

Why are people prosocial?
5 potential explanations:
We help people because
1. The beneﬁts outweigh the costs
2. It is the norm
3. We feel empathy and we want to reduce stress
4. We learned this from others (Lecture 3)
5. It is an inherited characteristic (Evolutionary psychology)

, 1. Cost-beneﬁt analysis: The decision to help depends on the consideration of costs and beneﬁts:
people want to minimalize their costs and maximize their beneﬁts.

2. It is the norm: Social norms are rules for acceptable and non-acceptable behavior in certain
situations
 Reciprocity norm: we feel inclined to help others who have helped us
 Social responsibility norm: we feel inclined to help others who are dependent on us

Schwartz theory of norm activation: Schwartz (1977) originally developed the NAM in the context of
altruistic behaviour. Personal norms form the core of this model. Schwartz (1977) states that these
norms are actively experienced “as feelings of moral obligation not as intentions” (p. 227). These
personal norms are used in the NAM to predict individual behaviour. The model states that these
personal norms are determined by two factors: the awareness that performing (or not performing)
the particular behaviour has certain consequences, and the feeling of responsibility for performing
the speciﬁc behaviour.

Personal norms are one’s individual feelings of moral obligation on how to behave in a certain
situation
 Are better to predict than social norms.
 Can be build up from societal norms, but also from other things (religion etc.)

Explanations presented mostly focused on cognitions
 Think + weight + decide = help
Do people only help from cognition, or is there more to it?

3. We feel empathy and want to reduce stress.
 Aversive arousal reduction  We want to reduce our arousal when witnessing an event or
emergency either by helping or by walking away = Altruism vs Egoism
 Negative state relief model  Motivating stems from egocentric reasons: helping to make
yourself feel better.
o Negative emotions evoked?
o Can we reduce them by doing something? Yes = helping
o Is helping a way to reduce the negative emotions?
 Empathy-altruism model  Motivation stems from altruistic reasons: helping to make the
other feel better
o Negative emotions evoked? Yes = help
o Do we feel empathy for the person in need? No = help out of self interest

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller elinemeuleman. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.31. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

69052 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling

Summary

Summary Development of Pro- and Antisocial Behaviour

Document information

Subjects

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview