● Utilitarian – greater benefit of the greatest number
- Educated at home by James Mill and his godfather Jeremy Bentham.
- His education was a utilitarian experiment.
- Had a major nervous breakdown at 21.
- By his 20 he was one of the major intellectuals in England.
- He was an examiner of Indian dispatchers in East India Company.
- Known for his dedication to Harriot Taylor - All he thought equally belongs to her and she was his
intellectual superior. Very remarkable in that era, also remarkable for coming from the most
accomplished intellectual of his era.
● Mill’s’ understanding of liberty
- “The object of this Essay is to assert one very simple principle...That principle is, that the sole
end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of
action of any of their number, is self-protection. The only purpose for which power can be
rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm
to others....Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign” (On Liberty,
1859, pg. 13)
- Do whatever you want as long as you do not harm others
J.S. MILL’S DOCTRINE OF LIBERTY
● Mill specifies that the doctrine of liberty:
- Applies only to human beings in the maturity of their faculties (does not apply to children)
- Does not apply to “backward states of society” or “barbarians” for whom despotism is a legitimate
form of government
- Constitutes a utilitarian argument (liberty will ensure the greatest good for the greatest number),
but he is also interested in utility in its widest sense, meaning that liberty promotes the greatest
good for “mankind”
- Though the doctrine of liberty is not new, “there is no doctrine which stands more directly
opposed to the general tendency of existing opinion and practice ” (pg. 16).
THE SUBJECTION OF WOMEN (1969)
- Was a result of a combination of passion and empirical social
science
- Liberal individualism as applied to women
- Legal subordination is wrong BOTH in itself AND hindrance to human improvement
- Goal = rational basis for women’s equality, demonstrating that it would be useful for society
- There is no basis to subjection in reason, and subjection at odds with efficient working of society
- Perceptions used to justify inequality are a product of habit NOT from women’s nature
- Method: empiricism + utilitarianism
- People had been substituting instinct for reason: do not think why women are oppressed
- No reason to assume that the way women appear reflects how they are or how they must be by
nature
- Subjection of women ultimately is a social institution
- Need empirical test of women’s equality, consistent with utilitarianism
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jessmoskowitz. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.