100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
NURS 328 Understanding Research Quiz 2 STUDY GUIDE |QUIZ TIPS NEW UPDATE| Athabasca University $15.49
Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

NURS 328 Understanding Research Quiz 2 STUDY GUIDE |QUIZ TIPS NEW UPDATE| Athabasca University

 7 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • NURS 328 Understanding Research
  • Institution
  • NURS 328 Understanding Research

NURS 328 Understanding Research Quiz 2 STUDY GUIDE |QUIZ TIPS NEW UPDATE| Athabasca University Unit 7 - Key Features of Quantitative Research Design: Interventions o Key questions ▪ Will there be an intervention? ▪ What specific design will be used? o Broad design options ▪ Experimenta...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 47  pages

  • December 20, 2024
  • 47
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • nurs 328 quiz 2 athabasca
  • NURS 328 Understanding Research
  • NURS 328 Understanding Research
avatar-seller
smartzone
NURS 328 Understanding Research Quiz 2 STUDY GUIDE (QUIZ TIPS NEW
UPDATE) Athabasca University


Unit 7
- Key Features of Quantitative Research Design: Interventions
o Key questions
▪ Will there be an intervention?
▪ What specific design will be used?
o Broad design options
▪ Experimental (randomized control trial)
▪ Quasi-experimental (INVOLVES controlled trial without
randomization) (ALWAYS A INTERVENTION)
▪ Nonexperimental (observational study)
- Key Features of Quantitative Research Design: Comparisons
o Key question
▪ What type of comparisons will be made to illuminate relationships?
o Some design options
▪ Within-subjects designs: Same people are compared at different
times or under different conditions
▪ Between-subjects design: Different people are compared (e.g.,
men and women)
- Other Key Features of Quantitative Research Design #1
o Control over confounding variables (= contaminating factors)
▪ How will confounding variables be controlled?
▪ Which specific confounding variables will be controlled?
▪ Ways confounding variables are controlled: Randomization,
crossover, homogeneity, matching, statistical control
- Other Key Features of Quantitative Research Design #2
o Masking/blinding
▪ From whom will critical information be withheld to avert bias? (so
that the behavior are unaware they are going/not going through
intervention)
o Time frames
▪ How often will data be collected?
▪ When, relative to other events, will data be collected?
▪ Cross-sectional (collected in one point of time), longitudinal
design (collected over time, 2 or more points)
- Other Key Features of Quantitative Research Design #3
o Relative timing
▪ When will information on independent and dependent
variables be collected – looking forward (prospective study)
or backward (retrospective study) in time?
▪ Retrospective (case-control), prospective (cohort)
o Location
▪ Where will the study take place?

, ▪ Setting choice; single site (ex: ONE hospital) vs multisite (ex:
MULTIPLE hospitals)
- Causality (cause and effect)  best determine through use appropriate research
designs approach
o Many (if not most) quantitative research questions are about causes and effects
o Research questions that seek to illuminate casual relationships
need to be addressed with appropriate designs
- The counterfactual Model of Causality
o A counterfactual is what would have happened to the same people
exposed to a “cause” if they simultaneously were not exposed to the
cause
o An effect represents the difference between what actually did happen
when exposed to the cause and what would happen with the
counterfactual condition
- Criteria for Causality
o Three key Criteria for making casual inferences
▪ Temporal: The cause must precede the effect in time
▪ Relationship: There must be a demonstrated association
between the cause and the effect
▪ Confounder: The relationship between the presumed cause and
effect cannot be explained by a third variable or confounder;
another factor related to both the presumed cause and effect
cannot be the “real” cause
- Additional Criteria for Causality
o Addition criterion in health research
▪ Biologic plausibility: The casual relationship should be
consistent with evidence from basic physiologic studies
- Research Questions and Research Design
o Different designs are appropriate for different questions.
▪ Therapy, prognosis, eitology/harm and description
o Experimental designs (RCTs) offer the strongest evidence (for cause and effect) of
whether a cause (an intervention) results in an effect (a desired outcome)
▪ That’s why they are high on evidence hierarchies for questions
about causes and effects
- Experimental Design #1 (3 components for a TRUE experiment)
o Intervention: The researcher does something to some subject – introduces an
intervention (or treatment)
o Control: The researcher introduces controls, including the use of a
control group counterfactual. (people who are not receiving the tx)
o Randomization: The experimenter assigns participants to a
control or experimental condition on a random basis
▪ The purpose is to make the groups equal with regard to all other factors
except receipt of the intervention
*** Key criterion for causality is cause occurring before the effect. An additional
criterion is that evidence of the relationship should come from multiple sources. (check
point “Criteria for Causality”)

,- Experimental Design #2
o Posttest-only (or after-only) design
▪ Outcome data collect only after the intervention
▪ Symbolic representation (2 groups):
R X O (intervention given  experimental,
measurement after)
R O (NO intevntion  controlled group,
measurement after)
▪ R= Randomization; X= Receipt of
intervention; O= Observation/measurement
of dependent variable
- Experimental Design #3
o Pretest-posttest (before-after) design
▪ Outcome data collected both at baseline (0 point in time) and
after the intervention
▪ Symbolic representation
R O X O (received intervention “x” 
experiemental)
R O O (NO intervention  controlled group)
- Experimental Design #4
o Crossover design (meet 3 charatceristics of experiemnt:
Randomization control experimentation)
▪ Subjects are exposed to 2+ conditions in random order
▪ Subjects serve as their own control
▪ Symbolic representation: Randomization, control,
experimentation (2 intervention) (control because subjects are
as their own control)
R O XA O XB O
R O XB O XA O
Experimental Condition
o Must be designed with sufficient intensity and duration that effects
might reasonably be expected
o Researchers describe the intervention in formal protocols that
stipulate exactly wat the treatment is (experiment is carried out
exactly as per protocol)
o Attention must be paid to intervention fidelity (or treatment fidelity),
that is, whether the treatment as planned was actually delivered and
received
- Control Group Conditions (counterfactuals)
o No intervention is used; control groups get no treatment at all
o “Usual care” or standard or normal procedures is used to treat patients
o An alternative intervention is used (e.g., auditory vs visual stimulation)
o A placebo or pseudo intervention, presumed to have no therapeutic
value, is used
o Attention control condition and delayed treatment (wait-listed)
- Control Group Conditions – (cont.)

, o Attention control – extra attention but not the active
ingredient of the intervention
o Delayed treatment (“wait-listed controls”) – the intervention is given at a later
date
o Symbolic representation:
R O X O
OR O O X
O
- Advantages and Disadvantages of experiments
o Advantages – most powerful for detecting cause and effect relationships
o Disadvantages – often not feasible or ethical (withhold info, deny
someone tx), Hawthrone effect (knowledge of being in a study may
cause people to change their behavior), often expensive
- Quasi-Experiments
o Involve an intervention but lack either randomization or control group
o Two main categories of quasi-experimental designs
▪ Nonequivalent control group designs
• Those getting the intervention are compared
with a nonrandomized comparison group
▪ Within-subjects designs
• One group is studied before and after the intervention
- Nonequivalent Control group Designs #1
o If preintervention data are gathered, then the comparability of the
experimental and comparison groups at the start of the study can be
examined
▪ Nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design
▪ Symbolic representation
O1 X O2
O1 O2
- Nonequivalent Control group Designs #2
o Without preintervention data, it is risky to assume the groups were similar
at the outset
▪ Nonequivalent control group posttest only is much weaker
▪ Symbolic representation: only posttest done therefore
nonequivalent (without prestest makes it hard to know what
effect the design has)
X O1
O1
- Within-Subjects Quasi-Experiments
o One-group pretest-posttest designs typically yield extremely weak
evidence of casual relationships
▪ Symbolic representation: NO comparison group (therefore
weak evidence)
O1 X O2
o Time-series designs gather preintervention and postintervention data
over a longer period

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller smartzone. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $15.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

51683 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$15.49
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added