100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Terms - Pre-Contractual Statements $5.32   Add to cart

Class notes

Terms - Pre-Contractual Statements

1 review
 16 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Terms - Pre-Contractual Statements

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • October 19, 2020
  • 6
  • 2019/2020
  • Class notes
  • Unknown
  • All classes

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: umerabibi • 3 year ago

avatar-seller
Terms – Pre-Contractual Statements

Pre-Contractual Statements
 Mere Puff.

 Advertising gimmick.
 Wouldn’t normally give rise to any legal consequences.

 Representation.

 Statement of fact which falls short of being a promise.
 Can help to make decision to enter a contract.
 Remains outside of the contract.
 Doesn’t contain a promise as to the truth of the statement.
 A false representation, whilst falling short of being a term, may give rise to a remedy
in misrepresentation.

 Term.

 Does involve a promise as to the truth of the statement.
 If a promise is broken, there is a breach of the contractual term.

How Do We Know? Test of Contractual Intention
 Is there evidence of an intention by one or both parties that there should be
contractual liability in respect of the accuracy of the statement?
 The test of intention is objective.

 Heilbut, Symons & Co v Buckleton (1913).

 The defendants, Heilbut et al, were merchants during the rubber trade boom of the
1910’s who claimed to underwrite shares in a rubber trading corporation (‘Filisola
Rubber and Produce Estates Ltd’).
 The claimant, Buckleton, contacted this corporation to enquire about shares
purchasing, to which a manager at Hilbut et al responded positively, insinuating the
creation of a new rubber company, which persuaded Buckleton to make a sizable
purchase for shares in the organization.
 The subsequently formed rubber production company proved to have far fewer
available resources than anticipated and thus suffered greatly in its initial
performance, causing Buckleton to sue for breach of warranty as the company’s
original representation had implicated far greater resources.
 At first instance, the Court contended that Heilbut et al had made an innocent
misrepresentation, however, upon appeal it was determined that no fraudulent
misrepresentation had occurred as the defending party had not been ‘reckless’ as to
the truth of the statement regarding their resources pool and further there was no
clear intent that their remarks regarding their resources should amount to a binding
contractual promise to act in parallel to their written agreement.

,  Thake v Maurice (1986).

 Consumer Rights Act 2015, s50.

 Every contract to supply a service is to be treated as including as a term of the
contract anything that is said or written to the consumer, by or on behalf of the
trader, about the trader or the service, if:


 It is taken into account by the consumer when deciding to enter into the contract.
 It is taken into account by the consumer when making any decision about the service
after entering into the contract.


 Anything taken into account by the consumer as mentioned in subsection (1)(a) or
(b) is subject to:


 Anything that qualified it and was said or written to the consumer by the trader on
the same occasion.
 Any change to it that has been expressly agreed between the consumer and the
trader (before entering into the contract or later).


 Without prejudice to subsection (1), any information provided by the trader in
accordance with regulation 9, 10 or 13 of the Consumer Contracts (Information,
Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/3134) is to be
treated as included as a term of the contract.
 A change to any of the information mentioned in subsection (3), made before
entering into the contract or later, is not effective unless expressly agreed between
the consumer and the trader.
 See section 54 for a consumer’s rights if the trader is in breach of a term that this
section requires to be treated as included in a contract.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller melindahogman. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.32. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

82215 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$5.32
  • (1)
  Add to cart