100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LPC Exam Notes - Dispute Resolution Workshop 15/16 (University of Law) $3.87   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LPC Exam Notes - Dispute Resolution Workshop 15/16 (University of Law)

2 reviews
 49 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Complete notes covering Workshop 15/16 of the University of Law's Dispute Resolution Module. - Criminal Case Analysis

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • November 12, 2020
  • 4
  • 2020/2021
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Answers

2  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: mollyguest • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: ms.t1 • 3 year ago

avatar-seller
DR WS 14/15
Criminal Case Analysis
Case Analysis Structure

To provide his client with a properly argued defence at trial, the defendant’s solicitor must carry out an
analysis of the case against his client.

Step What to do? Example Answer Structure

1 What are the  What it is that the CPS will need to prove in Example 1:
order to secure a conviction?  Who? Henry Tudor
legal elements  Actus Reus  What? Stole an iPad from his
of the offence  Mens Rea employer by failing to return it on
charged?  The defendant’s solicitor should prepare a termination of employment
brief narrative account of the prosecution  When? Between 4th April 2015 and 1st
What must case. Feb 2016
 Who?  Where? Basingstoke
the  Where?  How? by claiming he had already
prosecution  When? returned it and signing a piece of
prove?  What? paper confirming this
 How?
Example 2:
Offence AR MR  Who? The accused is Mr Dawood
Theft Appropriation of Dishonestly and with Malik
s9(1)(b) property belonging to intention to
Theft Act another permanently deprive.
 What? Mr Malik is accused of
1968 burglary from a garage attached to
Robbery Committed theft and in Intention or Melrose House. It is alleged that he
order to steal either recklessness as to the entered the property as a trespasser
used force/threat or put force
and stole goods therein
the victim in fear of Dishonesty and
immediate force intention to  When? the offence is alleged to have
whether before or at permanently deprive taken place on 10th August 2016. The
the time of threat. (theft element) offence would appear to have
ABH Used unlawful force Intention or
s47 OAPA
occurred some-time between 6:30 am
against the victim recklessness as to that
1861 Causing them an injury unlawful force. and 8 am
that is more that  Where? Melrose House, Main Street,
transient/trifling Norton, Greater Manchester (from
the Police Report & Charge Sheet)
 Prosecution burden  How? Together with another, Mr
 Has an initial evidential burden to show Malik is alleged to have forced open
that the defendant has a case to answer, the garage door, entered onto the
i.e. that there is sufficient credible property and removed two purple
evidence for each element of the offence. and green bikes, one silver
 The burden of proof will be on the Cannondale Bike, a Makita Cordless
prosecution throughout to prove that the Drill, and two silver Yale keys
defendant committed the offence beyond
reasonable doubt (Woolmington v DPP)
 To disprove the defence’s version of
events


 List each piece of evidence given, including bad Example 1:
2 Evidence the
character evidence, and state how it applies to  Interview recorded at police station
prosecution the elements of the offence set out in the 01.02.14 @ 12.55: His confession (a
has to prove example above. statement wholly or partly adverse to his
each element interests as per s82(1) PACE 1984) that
 Structure
the iPad was in possession and has since
of the offence  Heading e.g. “Name of Witness”
been given by him to a charity shop is
 Explanation of their evidence. admissible to help prove guilt (s76(1))
 Witness statement of Jane Seymour and
 Checklist receipts: She can state that H said to her
 This evidence may include: that he had returned the iPad already
1

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller izalpcnotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.87. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

66579 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.87
  • (2)
  Add to cart