Louisiana post - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Louisiana Post One Exam Questions and Answers probable cause - Answer️️ - more than bare suspicion. it exist when the facts and circumstances within the officers knowledge and of which they had reasonable trustworthy information are sufficient in themselves reasonable suspicion - Answer️️ - less demanding standard than probable cause not only in the same sense that reasonable suspicion can be established with information that is different in quantity and content that is required to...

5th Amendment - CORRECT ANSWER-Allows a person the right to not self incriminate 6th Amendment - CORRECT ANSWER-After being charged, the accused shall have the assistance of counsel 14th Amendment - CORRECT ANSWER-Right to due process DNA Evidence - CORRECT ANSWER-May be in the form of blood, hair, skin, sweat, or saliva Formally charged with an offense - CORRECT ANSWER-the occurrence of an indictment, information, or preliminary hearing has been arranged Frye - CORRECT ANSWER-general a...

Louisiana POST with complete solution

LOUISIANA POST 2024 STUDY GUIDE (ANSWERED 100% CORRECTLY) LATEST UPDATE,,,,Alpha

Louisiana POST Exam Questions With Correct Answers ...

Reasonable Suspicion - CORRECT ANSWER-Articulable facts, within the totality of the circumstances, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, which lead a deputy to reasonably believe that criminal activity has been, is being, or is about to be committed. Frisk - CORRECT ANSWER-A patting down of the outer garments of a subject for weapons. Two factors necessary: Legitimately stopped with reasonable suspicion The deputy has reason to believe that the suspect possesses weapo...

Louisiana POST Study Guide (Answered 100% Correctly) Latest Miranda vs. Arizona The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against selfincrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person ...

Louisiana POST Study Guide with complete solutions |Graded A| 42 Pages Miranda vs. Arizona - Answer️️ -The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self- incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - Answer️️ -Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - Answer️️ -Allowed the police to stop and search a...