Phil 447 Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Post 1 I decided to sway a bit away from the typical fallacies and go with "Argument" from outrage fallacy. Our book defines "Argument" from outrage as an appeal-to-emotion fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer “supports” a contention by trying to make us angry rather than by producing a real argument (Moore, 2014, p.442). For example, I would like to use the recent deaths of the men by the hands of police officers. I have noticed that instead of producing hard facts the media lik...

PHIL 447N WEEK 4 CHECKPOINT QUIZ Question 1 Not yet graded / 5 pts Based on what you have read in the text, the lecture, and any other sources you find helpful to your understanding of deductive arguments, explain the structure of a deductive argument in your own words. Your Answer: A deductive argument has two theories or statements that allow you to make an interpretation to determine if the statement is true or false. If the statements or theories are all true, then the result or c...

PHIL 447 WEEK 1 QUIZ PHILOSOPHY LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING Question 1. Question : (TCOs 2 and 3) In Chapter 1, we learned how to recognize the main issue in a passage. Consider the following example: “If you're going to buy a computer, you might as well sign up for some lessons on how to use the thing too. After all, no computer ever did any work for its owner until the owner found out how to make it work.” The main issue is whether or not Student Answer: computer can ...

PHIL 447N Final Exam Question 1.1. (TCO 1) What makes critical thinking critical? (Points : 4) It requires careful and deliberate work It is an analytic process It requires coming up with claims, true or otherwise It is the application of common sense to complex problems It offers guidance about critiquing thinking Question 2.2. (TCO 1, 2, 4) What is the first order of business when it comes to thinking critically about an issue? (Points : 4) Formulating a proposal Discovering whether the questi...

PHIL 447N Week 1 Quiz: Question: (TCOs 2 and 3) In Chapter 1, we learned how to recognize the main issue in a passage. Consider the following example: “The point is that you have to believe what w e experience through our senses because our senses are the only tools we have for interacting with the world.” The main issue is whether or not Question: (TCOs 2 and 3) In Chapter 1, we learned how to recognize the main issue in a passage. Consider the following example: “If you’re going to buy...

PHIL 447N Week 8 Final Exam Question 1.1. (TCO 1) “Thinking about thinking” is the definition of what? Question 2.2. (TCO 1, 2, 4) In Chapter 1, we learned the definition of the term issue. Th e principle concern when handling an issue is whether or not Question 3.3. (TCOs 1, 2, 3) In Chapter 1, we learned the definition of the term argument. The purpose of an argument is to Question 4.4. (TCOs 2, 3) In Chapter 2, we learned the meaning of inductive arguments. The support that the premises p...

Question 1.1. (TCO 1) What makes critical thinking critical? (Points : 4) It requires careful and deliberate work It is an analytic process It requires coming up with claims, true or otherwise It is the application of common sense to complex problems It offers guidance about critiquing thinking Question 2.2. (TCO 1, 2, 4) What is the first order of business when it comes to thinking critically about an issue? (Points : 4) Formulating a p...

PHIL 447N Week 4 Midterm Quiz (Version 1)answered/PHIL 447N Week 4 Midterm Quiz (Version 1)answered

PHIL 447N Week 4 Midterm Quiz (Version 1)answered

PHIL 447N Week 4 Midterm Quiz (Version 1)answered