Weeks v united states - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

NYPD 2nd trimester Law search & seizure Exam with Complete Solutions What is the purpose of the 4th Amendment? - Correct Answers To protect citizens from arbitrary and unrestrained government activity. Weeks v. United States - Correct Answers Established the Exclusionary Rule for the federal government Mapp v. Ohio - Correct Answers 1961 case law - All evidence obtained by searches in violation of the constitution is, by the same authority, inadmissible in a state court. exclusionary r...

A state's chief investigator and prosecutor ( state AG) is not neutral and detached, so any warrant issued by him or her is not valid. - CORRECT ANSWER-Coolidge v. New Hampshire The validity of a warrant must be judged in light of the information available to the officers at the time they obtained the warrant. A warrant that is overboard in describing the place to be searched is valid if based on a reasonable but mistaken belief at the time the warrant is issued. Also see, exclusionary ru...

Test Bank For Pharmacology A PatientCentered Nursing Process Approach, 11th Edition by Linda E. McCuistion Chapter 1- 58 | Updated Version 2023-2024. The nurse is using data collected to define a set of interventions to achieve the most desirable outcomes. Which of the following steps is the nurse applying? a. Recognizing cues (assessment) b. Analyze cues & prioritize hypothesis (analysis) c. Generate solutions (planning) d. Take action (nursing interventions) ANS: C When generating solut...

Legal cases Louisiana post latest update graded A A state's chief investigator and prosecutor ( state AG) is not neutral and detached, so any warrant issued by him or her is not valid. Coolidge v. New Hampshire The validity of a warrant must be judged in light of the information available to the officers at the time they obtained the warrant. A warrant that is overboard in describing the place to be searched is valid if based on a reasonable but mistaken belief at the time the warrant is issu...

Social workers should refer clients to other professionals in all of the following instances EXCEPT when: A. Professionals' specialized knowledge or expertise is needed to meet the clients' needs. B. Social workers believe they are not being effective in addressing clients' concerns. C. Professionals believe that other modalities of treatment may be more effective to resolve clients' issues. D. Social workers are not making reasonable progress in addressing clients' problems. - C A s...

GPSTC EXAM 2 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS EXAM REVIEW UPDATE A GRADE Probable Cause - ANS-Facts or circumstances that would make a reasonable or prudent person believe a crime is being or has been committed. Probable Cause is the basis: - ANS-To arrest, to search, to seize Exclusionary Rule - ANS-Evidence illegally obtained will not be admissible in court Weeks v. United States - ANS-Established the exclusionary rule in federal cases. Prohibited evidence obtained by illegal searches and sei...

AP GOVERNMENT REVIEW SET EXAM REVIEW TERMS 2024 UPDATE United States Politics 10th Amendment - ANS-Powers not expressly given to federal government by the Constitution are reserved to states or the people. Also known as "reserved powers amendment" or "states' rights amendment" 13th Amendment - ANS-Abolished slavery. First of three "Reconstruction Amendments" passed after Civil War (1865-70) 14th Amendment - ANS-(1) All persons born in the U.S. are citizens; (2) no person can be ...

Legal cases Louisiana post Exam Questions and Answers A state's chief investigator and prosecutor ( state AG) is not neutral and detached, so any warrant issued by him or her is not valid. - Answer ️️ -Coolidge v. New Hampshire The validity of a warrant must be judged in light of the information available to the officers at the time they obtained the warrant. A warrant that is overboard in describing the place to be searched is valid if based on a reasonable but mistaken belief at the ...

Tennessee v. Garner(1985) - ️️If an officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a threat of serious bodily harm either to fellow officers or to others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force. Terry v. Ohio (1968) - ️️An officer may perform a search for weapons without a warrant, even without probable cause, when the officer reasonably believes that the person may be armed and dangerous. Chimel v. California (1968) - ️️Supreme...

GPSTC Exam 2 Questions with All Correct Answers Probable Cause - Answer-Facts or circumstances that would make a reasonable or prudent person believe a crime is being or has been committed. Probable Cause is the basis: - Answer-To arrest, to search, to seize Exclusionary Rule - Answer-Evidence illegally obtained will not be admissible in court Weeks v. United States - Answer-Established the exclusionary rule in federal cases. Prohibited evidence obtained by illegal searches and seizur...