Graham v connor Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Graham v. Connor (1989) - correct answer -Recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard Graham Factors - correct answer -Severity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is actively resisting arrest Attempting to evade arrest b...

A guy robs a bank and gets locked inside, what can you charge him with? Robbery, he had the note and the intention Pull up to a domestic, where should you position the vehicle? Several houses away from the dispatch address How should a patrol vehicle be positioned on a traffic stop? 3 feet offset to the left A father complains that the mother of his kid would not let him see his kid over the weekend, what do you do? Advise him to contact his lawyer because that is a civil matter ...

FLETC WRITTEN EXAM 1 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT ANSWERS 2023/2024 GRADED A+. 2 / 32 1. Graham v. Connor (1989): Recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard 2. Graham Factors: Severity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is act...

Define: Utah Computerized Criminal History - (UCCH) - Used for: detection, apprehension, detention, pretrial release, post trial release, prosecution, adjudication, correctional supervision, rehab, pre-employment. (spreading of info to unauthorized parties is a felony offense) When is a weapon deemed loaded? - When there is an unexpected cartridge, shell or projectile in the firing position. What are the 6 Ethical and Moral Standards? - - Integrity - Honesty - Values - Standards - Coura...

Miranda vs. Arizona - CORRECT ANSWER-The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed...

Utah SFO Final Exam Questions and Answers Already Passed When should you get a written statement (4 reasons) -Reluctant -Key witness -Will not be able to testify -May change statement in court Brown V. Mississippi 1936 Use of force in obtaining a confession will make the confession inadmissible in court 4 behavioral signs of addiction Neglecting responsibilities -Unexplained reasons for money -Engaging in suspicious behavior -Taking unnecessary risks Legal Search Items -Wea...

FLETC Written Exam #1 Study Guide. Graham v. Connor (1989) - answerRecognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard Graham Factors - answerSeverity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is actively resisting arrest Attempting to ...

FLETC Written Exam #1 Review Questions and answers, VERIFIED/ Graham v. Connor (1989) - -Recognized that the right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion/threat to affect it. In the course of an arrest or stop is properly analyzed by Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard Graham Factors - -Severity of crime Whether suspect poses an immediate threat Whether suspect is actively resisting a...

Miranda vs. Arizona - CORRECT ANSWER-The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed...

CLEET Certification Exam (Latest 2024/ 2025 Update) Questions and Verified Answers| 100% Correct| Grade A Q: The titles of Oklahoma's statutes most frequently used by law enforcement officers in Oklahoma are what? Answer: 21,22,37a,47 and 63 Q: The exception to the hearsay rule that allows the jury to hear a statement made while the declarant was still under the stress caused by the crime is commonly known as what? Answer: Excited utterance exception Q: The three ma...