Phil 347 week 4 - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

PHIL 347 WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT(CRITICAL REASONING) / UPDATED VERSION 2023/2024 GRADED A+. Week 2 Assignment journal Chamberlain University college of nursing Philosophy: Critical reasoning November 7, 2023 The most valuable and important idea in this section is the statement there is a way to ask “why” in ever language. The question why is how people makes sense of the world. It is universal way of connecting with and understanding one another. The question “why” is where lOMoARc...

PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz (Verified 2023/2024).What are the component premises are there in the following statement: "If it weren’t for how much it costs and how big it is, I’d buy that TV for our bedroom." Your Answer: The first premise of the following statement is that the TV is very expensive and the person cannot afford it. The second premise is that the TV is very big and would not fit in the bedroom of the person who wants to purchase it. Question 4 10 / 10 pts Go to t...

Phil 347 Week 4 Checkpoint Quiz (Dual Version) Based on what you have read in the text, the lecture, and any other sources you find helpful to your understanding of deductive arguments, explain the structure of a deductive argument in your own words. Your Answer: A deductive argument typically has two premises and a conclusion based on those premises. In order for the conclusion to be true, the premises must be true as well. Therefore, if the premises are true, the conclusion will c...

Week 4 Assignment Chamberlain University PHIL347N: Critical Reasoning Inference: Briefly discuss how the lexical definitions and connotations of "valid" and "warranted" can help us un derstand the differing purposes of deductive and inductive arguments. • Valid is something well-grounded on principles or evidence; able to withstand criticism or objection, as an argument; sound. For example, a passport is valid until it is expired. Warranted is thought to be the ingredient that separates me...

Inference: Briefly discuss how the lexical definitions and connotations of "valid" and "warranted" can help us understand the differing purposes of deductive and inductive arguments. • Valid i s something well-grounded on principles or evidence; able to withstand criticism or objection, as an argument; sound. For example, a passport is valid until it is expired. Warranted is thought to be the ingredient that separates mere true belief from actual knowledge. It is a matter of controversy. T...

1. Based on what you have read in the text, the lecture, and any other sources you find helpful to your understanding of deductive arguments, explain the structure of a deductive argument in your own words. A deductive argument is a sound argument that shows a logical relationship between two premises that lead to or infer a conclusion. Deductive reason allows for certainty as long as certain rules are followed. Beginning with a statement we believe to be true or false. This is called the premi...

PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion; Truth-Functional Logic

PHIL 347 Critical Thinking Week 3 Checkpoint Quiz Q&A Score for this quiz: 48 out of 50 Submitted May 24 at 6:04pm This attempt took 149 minutes. According to the text, how do the views of stronger, more developed critical thinkers toward authority differ from those in earlier stages of cognitive development? Your Answer: Developed critical thinkers are skeptical. They will not trust the word of an authority figure without skepticism and their own research. Critical Thinkers are likely r...

PHIL 347 WEEK 4 Check Point Quiz week 4 1. Based on what you have read in the text, the lecture, and any other sources you find helpful to your understanding of deductive arguments, explain the structure of a deductive argument in your own words. A deductive argument is a sound argument that shows a logical relationship between two premises that lead to or infer a conclusion. Deductive reason allows for certainty as long as certain rules are followed. Beginning with a statement we believe to ...

Initial Post Instructions Consider some of the skills and knowledge you need to understand truth-functional logic. Forming the truth-functional claims means you have to have a good understanding of how English sentences are formed in order to convey accurate and precise meaning. Translating English sentences into symbolic language requires you to distinguish the parts of complex thought, put those thoughts into logical order, and make inferences from them. For the initial post, address the fol...