Aicp law cases exam - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries
Looking for the best study guides, study notes and summaries about Aicp law cases exam? On this page you'll find 4 study documents about Aicp law cases exam.
All 4 results
Sort by
-
AICP Law Cases exam 2024_2025 fully solved & updated.
- Exam (elaborations) • 6 pages • 2024
-
- $10.99
- + learn more
AICP Law Cases exam 2024_2025 fully solved & updated.
-
AICP Law Cases Exam Study Guide Solutions
- Exam (elaborations) • 9 pages • 2024
-
- $11.49
- + learn more
AICP Law Cases Exam Study Guide 
Solutions 
Mugler v Kansas - ANSWER-1887, 14th amendment due process case which rules that Kansas could 
prohibit sale of alcohol based on police power. 
Welch v Swasey - ANSWER-1909, Boston can impose different height limits on buildings in different 
districts 
Eubank v City of Richmond - ANSWER-1912, A zoning ordinance establishing building setback lines 
was held unconstitutional and not a valid use of the police power; violates the due process of law and is ...
-
AICP Law Cases Exam Study Guide 2024
- Exam (elaborations) • 9 pages • 2024
-
- $10.49
- + learn more
AICP Law Cases Exam Study Guide 2024 
Mugler v Kansas - Answer️️ -1887, 14th amendment due process 
case which rules that Kansas could prohibit sale of alcohol based 
on police power. 
Welch v Swasey - Answer️️ -1909, Boston can impose different 
height limits on buildings in different districts 
Eubank v City of Richmond - Answer️️ -1912, A zoning ordinance 
establishing building setback lines was held unconstitutional and 
not a valid use of the police power; violates the due proce...
-
AICP Exam - Law Cases Study Guide Solutions
- Exam (elaborations) • 12 pages • 2024
-
- $12.49
- + learn more
AICP Exam - Law Cases Study Guide 
Solutions 
Zoning Cases (Summary) - ANSWER-Welch v. Swasey; (1909) regulate building height. 
Eubank v. City of Richmond; (1912) first approved the use of setback regulations 
Hadacheck v. Sebastian (1915) regulation of the location of land uses. 
Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. (1926) community believed that there was a threat of a nuisance, 
the zoning ordinance should be upheld. Alfred Bettman 
Nectow v. City of Cambridge;(1928) 
rational basis test t...
Want to regain your expenses?
How much did you already spend on Stuvia? Imagine there are plenty more of you out there paying for study notes, but this time YOU are the seller. Ka-ching! Discover all about earning on Stuvia