Miller v california 1973 - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

JRN 430 Final Exam Questions And Answers LAPS test -Part of the criteria for determining obscenity in Miller v. California (1973) -Work is considered obscene if it lacks "literary, artistic, political or "scientific" value." Roth v. US (1957) Roth convicted of mailing obscene materials; Supreme Court ruled (also applied to Alberts v. California) that obscenity was not protected under 1st Amendment.

Fourth Amendment correct answersforbids the police to conduct searches & seizures without probable cause Fifth Amendment correct answersprotects against double Sixth Amendment correct answersright to have legal counsel, to confront witnesses, speedy trial and trial by 'jury of peers' in criminal proceedings Eighth Amendment correct answersprotection against excessive bail/fines, cruel and unusual punishment Gitlow v. New York (1925) correct answersbad tendency test Bill of Right...

MMC 4200 Exam 3 Detailed Questions and Answers_100% A+ Graded Ira Isaacs Case Facts - CORRECT ANSWER--Federal Jury in LA convicted adult filmmaker on multiple accounts of obscenity for distributing on his website fetish films that featured Scatology and bestiality -filmmaker testified that his movies were a form of "shock art" that merely "explored the darker side of the human condition." Ira Isaacs Case Ruling - CORRECT ANSWER--In 2013, the 61-year-old filmmaker was sentenced to 4 ye...

Miller v. California: 1973; freedom of speech (obscenity); declared that work is obscene if 1) work is prurient 2) offensive way 3) lacks literacy value Falwell v. Flynt: hustler magazine's parody of jerry flynt was deemed within the law. 1st amendment protects against parodies because the audience should know that they are not factual. flynt was trying to sue for emotional distress and did not win Red Lion Co. v. FCC: FCC fairness doctrine requires radio and television broadcasters t...

Marbury v. Madison - Answer-This case involved the Judiciary Act of 1789. The Supreme Court declared that the law conflicted with the U.S. Constitution, and the case established the principle of judicial review wherein the Supreme Court has the power to declare laws passed by Congress and signed by the president to be unconstitutional. Dred Scott v. Sanford - Answer-Supreme Court case that decided US Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in federal territories and slaves, as p...

Marbury v. Madison (1803) Established judicial review. The courts have the power to strike down laws that they find to violate the Constitution. Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) The Constitution was not meant to include American citizenship for black people. Brainpower Read More Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Separate but equal - Racial segregation laws for public facilities are Constitutional as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality. United States v. Miller (1...

CPCE Study Guide 1945 Questions with Answers 2023 The Sensorimotor period is part of whose developmental stage theory? - CORRECT ANSWER Piaget Presenting stimuli in different sequences to reduce "order of presentation" influences in an experiment is called: - CORRECT ANSWER Counterbalancing The Eskimo word "piblokto" refers to "arctic hysteria," characterized by uncontrolled screaming and crying that is often accopanied by running through the snow naked. This is an example of wh...

Major Court Cases American Government CLEP (2022/2023) Already Graded A Marbury v. Madison (1803) Established Judicial Review; "midnight judges"; John Marshall; power of the Supreme Court. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Established national supremacy; established implied powers; use of elastic clause; state unable to tax fed. Institution; John Marshall; "the power to tax the power to destroy." Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) Established a broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause; determined Cong...

Miller v. California : A 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity by holding that community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a "prurient interest" and being "patently offensive" and lacking in value. Falwell v. Flynt : Freedom of speech against public figures (political cartoons) Red Lion Co. v. FCC : A radio station was forced to provide free airtime to a book author whose character was attacked on the air. It ...

Reynolds v. United States (1879) - correct answer polygamy is not constitutional Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) - correct answer separate but equal Schenck v. United States (1919) - correct answer clear and present danger Gitlow v. New York (1925) - correct answer degrading US government isn't constitutional Near v...