Terry v ohio Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Chain of Custody The chronological paper trail showing the seizure, custody, control, transfer, analysis, and deposition of evidence is documented Contamination or alteration by responding medical personnel at a crime scene can be limited if an officer A. Moves the victims for better access B. Guides the medical personnel to the victims C. Administers all medical care themselves D. Makes sure the medical personnel clean up B. Guides the medical personnel to the victims After ...

MPOETC CERTIFICATION TEST/151 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (A+) 1st Amendment (1791) - √Answer :Freedom of speech, religion and press and the right to petition Quiz :2nd Amendment (1791) - √Answer :Right to bear arms Quiz :3rd Amendment (1791) - √Answer :The government may not house soldiers in private homes without consent of the owner Quiz :4th Amendment (1791) - √Answer :Freedom from unreasonable search and seizures Quiz :5th Amendment (1791) - √Answer :Double jeopardy, ...

Miranda vs. Arizona - Answer- The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - Answer- Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - Answer- Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is...

Louisiana POST Study Guide (Answered 100% Correctly) Latest Louisiana POST Study Guide (Answered 100% Correctly) Latest Miranda vs. Arizona The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against selfincrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio Allowed the police to stop and se...

Miranda vs. Arizona - CORRECT ANS The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANS Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - CORRECT ANS Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is c...

Subjects of an interrogation are witnesses and victims who are willing to provide police with information they possess about a matter under investigation - Answer- F Simple Robbery is the taking of anything of value belonging to another form the person of another by the use of force or intimidation while armed with a firearm - Answer- F A batter "under the color of law" can result in a civil rights lawsuit. - Answer- T Livor Mortis is the stiffening of muscles are death due to chemica...

K (J) Unit 4 Your Rights Due Process 4, 5th, Miranda due process, warrants cases mapp v ohio, New York v. Quarles 1983, Duckwork v Egan, Horton v california , Terry v Ohio, Miranda, Alvarodo, Revised Exam Questions 2024. 4th Amendments 5th - CORRECT ANSWER Right of the adcused helps The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, sppor...

POST EXAM PRACTICE TEST Question and Answers 2023 Rated A+ Subjects of an interrogation are witnesses and victims who are willing to provide police with information they possess about a matter under investigation - F Simple Robbery is the taking of anything of value belonging to another form the person of another by the use of force or intimidation while armed with a firearm - F A batter "under the color of law" can result in a civil rights lawsuit. - T Livor Mortis is the stif...

K (J) Unit 4 Your Rights Due Process 4, 5th, Miranda due process, warrants cases mapp v ohio, New York v. Quarles 1983, Duckwork v Egan, Horton v california , Terry v Ohio, Miranda, Alvarodo Written Exam 2024. 4th Amendments 5th - CORRECT ANSWER Right of the adcused helps The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, spported by Oath or ...

GPSTC FINAL EXAM QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ALREADY PASSED Whatever force is REASONABLE How much force can be used to affect an arrest? arrest Restricting a persons movement Graham v. Connor What court case established objective reasonableness? Terry v. Ohio Stop and Frisk. What case? Actual and Constructive What are the 2 types of seizures? seizure a government termination of movement through means intentionally applied 1. Verbal Encounter 2. Brief Seizure 3. Arrest ...