Terry v ohio 1968 Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Weeks v. US (1914) - Answer Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) - Answer "Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion - Answer a suspicion based on specific facts, training, and experi...

Weeks v. US (1914) - CORRECT ANSWER-Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) - CORRECT ANSWER-"Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion - CORRECT ANSWER-a suspicion based on specific facts, tra...

100% Solved Weeks v. US (1914) Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) "Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion a suspicion based on specific facts, training, and experience; less than ...

MN POST Test Weeks v. US (1914) - CORRECT ANSWER-Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) - CORRECT ANSWER-"Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion - CORRECT ANSWER-a suspicion based on specif...

Weeks v. US (1914) - Correct Answer Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) - Correct Answer "Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion - Correct Answer a suspicion based on specific facts, tr...

Defenses Section 1983 lawsuits - ️️civil lawsuits authorized by a federal statute against state and local officials and local agencies when citizens have evidence that these officials or agencies have violated their federal constitutional rights to Criminal Sexual Assault/Abuse - ️️consensual lack of verbal or physical resistance Outline the process of a felony case. - ️️Statute of Limitations= 3 years for most felonies Charged via an info. or indictment Preliminary hearing ...

3 Pillars of Community Policing - ANS Developing Community Partnerships, engaging in problem solving using SARA, Implementing organizational features/transformation. Define the components of the SARA Model. - ANS Scanning- identify and prioritize problems and develop goals. Analysis- identify and understand the events that precede and accompany the problem. Response- Brainstorm for new interventions, outline a response plan, carry out planned activities. Assessment- determine whether ...

MN POST Test(question and answers)graded A+ already passed 2023Weeks v. US (1914) - correct answer Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) - correct answer "Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Sus...

The decision in Carroll v. U.S. (1925) created the vehicle exception to the warrant requirement. How did this decision change the requirements for searches of vehicles as compared to those of homes? The warrant requirement was removed in vehicle searches, unlike the warrant required when searching homes. In the absence of an arrest, what is the difference between searches of containers in vehicles before and after SCOTUS' ruling in California v. Acevedo (1991)? Until 1991, officers cou...

MN POST Test Questions and Verified Solutions 2024 Weeks v. US (1914) - Answer -Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) - Answer -"Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion - Answer -a suspicio...