Undermine to weaken Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

sibling - a brother or a sister acquaintance - someone you know but who is not a close friend spouse - husband or wife a person who pledged marriage invalidate - To make valueless, or worthless. To take away all force emphasis - Something that is given great stress or importance emphasise - stress, highlight, make clear misled - To lead or guide wrongly; lead astray entitle - to give someone a title, right, or claim to something obligation - something that ties a person to a certain cou...

sibling - a brother or a sister acquaintance - someone you know but who is not a close friend spouse - husband or wife a person who pledged marriage invalidate - To make valueless, or worthless. To take away all force emphasis - Something that is given great stress or importance emphasise - stress, highlight, make clear misled - To lead or guide wrongly; lead astray entitle - to give someone a title, right, or claim to something obligation - something that ties a person to a certain cou...

logic correct answers the process of reasoning by including evidence to support claims syllogism correct answers a logical structure that uses the major premise and minor premise to reach a necessary conclusion (ex: If A is true and B is true then the conclusion C is true) Ockham's Razor correct answers Keep it simple sweetheart - the simplest explanation is usually the correct one Aristotle correct answers A Greek Philosopher, father of logic, taught Alexander the Great heuristics ...

Vocab Unit 3 Exam 2024.Delete - ANSWER to erase impartial - ANSWER fair integrity - ANSWER honesty legitimate - ANSWER considered proper lenient - ANSWER easygoing menace - ANSWER danger morale - ANSWER spirit naive - ANSWER lacking experience overt - ANSWER obvious undermine - ANSWER to weaken fair; not biased - ANSWER impartial a threat - ANSWER menace in accordance with accepted laws, rules, and standards - ANSWER legitimate state of mind with respect to...

Outcome: • Appeal dismissed in favour of the plaintiff, i.e. Curtis wins. Reasoning: Denning LJ: • The issue of misrepresentation arose, given that the defendant‟s shop assistant had misrepresented the breadth of the exclusion clause - since the defendant was protected from all liability, not just specific liabilities (e.g. sequins, beads). • The effect of signature can be negatived if induced by misrepresentation or fraud. o Misrepresentation can relate to both the existence and th...

The word argument means A conversation between two people who do not agree. It also means "a claim" Critical Reasoning Overview The Verbal Section contains 9-10 Critical Reasoning questions. You have a little less than 2 minutes on average to solve each of them, so you need to know how to solve them methodically, quickly, and correctly. To be able to do so, you need to be familiar with the Critical Reasoning question structure. A Critical Reasoning question is made of three part...

Proscribe - ANS IS; Forbid Holistic - ANS IS; Concerned with whole Repugnant - ANS IS; Offensive; to morals Exiguous - ANS IS; inadequency; lacking Untenable - ANS IS; No support; ground Clement - ANS IS; favorable Adversity - ANS IS; a state of burden or hardship Anecdote - ANS IS; a short story or account of an event Assiduous - ANS IS; diligent; hard-working Benevolent - ANS IS; showing sympathy, understanding, and generosity Boisterous - ANS IS; rough; rowdy; unruly Brazen - ANS IS; bo...

P a g e 14 | 264 3. Non est factum („not my deed‟ ) – a very specific and limited exception, such as situations where the person is illiterate, blind or below standard intelligence. Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing [1951] 1 KB 805 – Court of Appeal (Appeal from Judge Blagden, Westminster County Court) Facts: • Curtis (plaintiff) took a white satin wedding dress to Chemical Cleaning (defendant) for cleaning. • The defendant‟ s shop assistant handed the plaintiff a paper...

HESI ,HESI A2, HESI A2 Vocabulary 129 Questions with Verified Answers Proscribe - CORRECT ANSWER Forbid Holistic - CORRECT ANSWER Concerned with whole Repugnant - CORRECT ANSWER Offensive; to morals Exiguous - CORRECT ANSWER inadequency; lacking Untenable - CORRECT ANSWER No support; ground Clement - CORRECT ANSWER favorable Adversity - CORRECT ANSWER a state of burden or hardship Anecdote - CORRECT ANSWER a short story or account of an event Assiduous - CORRECT ANSWER...

Type 1: Must Be True/ Conclusion/ Inference - Type 1v= "Most Strongly Supported" 13.7% of LR -correct answer If statements above are true, then which of the following must also be true? Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above? Type 2: Strengthen/ Premise/ Weaken - Type 2 - Type 2n - Type 2s 27.2% of LR -correct answer The argument above would be most strengthened if which one of the following were true? The argument is based on ...