Weeks v us 1914 Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

American Politics and the US Constitution - C963 WGU Correctly Solved 2023 natrual rights ->>Life, Liberty, and Property John Locke ->>17th century English philosopher who opposed the Divine Right of Kings and who asserted that people have a natural right to life, liberty, and property. State of Nature ->>Hypothetical condition assumed to exist in the absence of government where human beings live in "complete" freedom and general equality. Due Process ->>involves the ...

Weeks v. US (1914) - CORRECT ANSWER-Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) - CORRECT ANSWER-"Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion - CORRECT ANSWER-a suspicion based on specific facts, tra...

Weeks v. US (1914) Correct Answer Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) Correct Answer "Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion Correct Answer a suspicion based on specific facts, training...

MN POST Test Weeks v. US (1914) - CORRECT ANSWER-Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) - CORRECT ANSWER-"Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion - CORRECT ANSWER-a suspicion based on specif...

Weeks v. US (1914) - Correct Answer Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) - Correct Answer "Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion - Correct Answer a suspicion based on specific facts, tr...

100% Solved Weeks v. US (1914) Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) "Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion a suspicion based on specific facts, training, and experience; less than ...

Weeks v. US (1914) - Answer Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) - Answer "Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion - Answer a suspicion based on specific facts, training, and experi...

MN POST Test Questions and Verified Solutions 2024 Weeks v. US (1914) - Answer -Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) - Answer -"Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion - Answer -a suspicio...

1. Good Faith Exception *DOES NOT APPLY IN GEORGIA - U.S V. Leon (1984): A search warrant was made and large amounts of drugs were found and Leon was indicted. Evidence was suppressed b/c there was no PC. The US Supreme Court created the Good Faith exception to the exclusionary rule. *When officers act in "Good Faith" by doing everything he/she can 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on Prosecution - Prosecution MUST show: 1. the Lawful means that made discovery inevitable, were POSSESSED by ...

MN POST Test 1 with Questions and Answers Weeks v. US (1914) ANSWER Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) ANSWER "Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion ANSWER a suspicion based on spe...