(a) For each of the following statements give the converse, the contrapositive and the
negation of the statement.
(i) When I go shopping, then I take plastic bags.
converse: I take plastic bags when I go shopping.
contrapositive: I don’t take plastic bag when I am not going shopping.
negation: When I go shopping, I never take plastic bags with me.
(ii) x 2= B implies x 2 X and x 2 Y
converse: If x 2 X and x 2 Y then x 2 = B:
contrapositive: If x 2 = X or x 2= Y then x 2 B:
negation: If x 2 = B then either x 2
= X or x 2
= Y:
(iii) If jxj < 3; then x 2 A \ B
converse: If x 2 A \ B then jxj < 3:
contrapositive: If x 2 A \ B then jxj 3:
negation: If jxj < 3; then x 2 = A \ B:
(iv) 0 < jx + 2j < implies jf (x) Lj < "
converse: If jf (x) Lj < " then 0 < jx + 2j < :
contrapositive: If jf (x) Lj " then jx + 2j where x 6= 2:
negation: If 0 < jx + 2j < then jf (x) Lj ":
(b) There exists b 2 B such that for each x 2 A; x b:
Negation: For every b 2 B there exists an x 2 A such that x > b:
(c) Use a proof by contradiction to establish the following:
If a positive whole number n can be expresses p as n1 n2 , where n1 2 and n2 2;then
at least one of the set fn1 , n2 g is less than n:
Proof:
Suppose n = n1 n2 with n1 2 and n2 2 and n1 6= n2 :
NB
This next assumption is the most important p part of p
your proof. p
Assume that neither of n1 nor n2 is less than n; i.e. n1 n and n2 n:( )
Now let p
n1 = n + 1
and p
n2 = n+ 1
1
, where both
1 0 and 2 0, 1 6= 2 (since n1 6= n2 ).
At least one of 1 and 2 is strictly larger than 0. Suppose that 1 > 0:
Then
n = n1 n2
p p
= ( n + 1 )( n + 2 )
p
= n + n( 1 + 2 ) + 1 2
> n
since ( 1 + 2 ) > 0:
This is surely a contradiction and thus our assumption ( ) is wrong.
Thus pif n = n1 n2 , where n1 2 and n2 2;then at least one of the set fn1 , n2 g is less
than n:
QUESTION 2
(a) Prove by induction that
3n 2n2 + 1 for all n 2 N
Proof:
If n = 1; then LHS = 3 and the RHS = 2 + 1 = 3
Hence 3n 2n2 + 1 is true for n = 1:
Suppose true for n = k; k 1:Then
3k 2k 2 + 1 (*)
Now we need to prove the equation is also true for n = k + 1 using (*) i.e. we need to prove
.
3k+1 2(k + 1)2 + 1
LHS = 3k+1 = 3(3k )
3(2k 2 + 1) = 6k 2 + 3 using (* )
RHS = 2(k + 1)2 + 1
= 2k 2 + 4k + 2 + 1
= 2k 2 + 4k + 3
2k 2 + 4k 2 + 3
= 6k 2 + 3
Thus we have porved the RHS LHS i.e.
3k+1 2(k + 1)2 + 1
(b) 8 2x 1
>
< if x 6= 1
g (x) = x+1
>
:
2 if x = 1
2
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mathmadeeasy. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R153,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.